Brazy v. Brazy
| Decision Date | 06 January 1959 |
| Citation | 93 N.W.2d 856,5 Wis.2d 352 |
| Parties | June F. BRAZY, Appellant, v. Robert R. BRAZY, Respondent. |
| Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
On motion for rehearing.
For original opinion see, 92 N.W.2d 738.
Charles H. Galin, Milwaukee, for appellant.
Hersh & Magidson, Milwaukee, for respondent.
The respondent husband has raised a number of questions as to the effect of our decision, but these questions go beyond the issues properly before us on the appeal. Our decision did not impair the jurisdiction of the Wisconsin court to hear a motion to modify the rights and obligations of these parties with respect to custody, alimony, or support money. We decided that it was error for the Wisconsin court to entertain the motion of appellant husband brought November 5, 1957 while the action in California court was pending, but did not decide that the Wisconsin court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter.
Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Teague v. Bad River Band of Chippewa Indians
...held that it would be an abuse of discretion to exercise judicial power. Thus, in Brazy v. Brazy (1958), 5 Wis. 2d 352, 92 N.W.2d 738, 93 N.W.2d 856, this court has stated: "... The orderly administration of justice requires that there be some rule for avoiding the conflicting exercise of j......
-
Krause v. Krause, 58
...Block v. Block, supra; Anderson v. Anderson (1959), 8 Wis.2d 133, 98 N.W.2d 434; Brazy v. Brazy (1958), 5 Wis.2d 352, 92 N.W.2d 738, 93 N.W.2d 856. Where such modification is made, the question on appeal is whether there has been an abuse of discretion. Anderson v. Anderson, supra, p. 142, ......
-
Sheridan v. Sheridan
...that it would be an abuse of discretion to exercise jurisdictional power. Thus, in Brazy v. Brazy (1958), 5 Wis.2d 352, 92 N.W.2d 738, 93 N.W.2d 856, this court has '. . . The orderly administration of justice requires that there be some rule for avoiding the conflicting exercise of jurisdi......
-
Anderson v. Anderson
...defer to the Colorado proceedings. Appellant in support of this contention cites Brazy v. Brazy (1958), 5 Wis.2d 352, 92 N.W.2d 738, 93 N.W.2d 856. In that case the parties were divorced in Wisconsin, and the wife was awarded custody of the children. She and the children moved to California......