Brekhus v. N. Dakota Dep't of Transp., No. 20170296

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
Writing for the CourtPer Curiam.
Citation909 N.W.2d 113 (Mem)
Decision Date10 April 2018
Docket NumberNo. 20170296
Parties Deanne M. BREKHUS, Appellee v. NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant

909 N.W.2d 113 (Mem)

Deanne M. BREKHUS, Appellee
v.
NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant

No. 20170296

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Filed April 10, 2018


Chad R. McCabe, Bismarck, ND, for appellee.

Douglas B. Anderson, Office of Attorney General, Bismarck, ND, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] The North Dakota Department of Transportation appeals from the district court’s judgment reversing an administrative hearing officer’s decision revoking Deanne M. Brekhus’s driving privileges for 180 days.

[¶ 2] The administrative hearing officer found law enforcement had reason to believe Brekhus committed a moving traffic violation and Brekhus refused to submit to either on-site screening or chemical tests. The district court reversed, concluding the evidence presented at the administrative hearing was obtained in violation of Brekhus’s constitutional rights. The Department appealed, arguing the evidence was obtained under the hot pursuit exception to the warrant requirement. We agree, concluding City of Bismarck v. Brekhus , 2018 ND 84, ¶ 27, 908 N.W.2d 715, controls in this appeal. There, we held the officer’s warrantless, limited entry into Brekhus’s open garage while in hot pursuit was constitutionally reasonable. We summarily reverse the judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b) and reinstate the administrative order.

[¶ 3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • State v. Rutherford, No. 20170370
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • April 10, 2018
    ...ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.Kiara C. Kraus–Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.Per Curiam.909 N.W.2d 113[¶ 1] Robert William Rutherford appeals from a criminal judgment ordering restitution after Rutherford pled guilty to conspiracy to commit criminal m......
1 cases
  • State v. Rutherford, No. 20170370
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Dakota
    • April 10, 2018
    ...ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.Kiara C. Kraus–Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.Per Curiam.909 N.W.2d 113[¶ 1] Robert William Rutherford appeals from a criminal judgment ordering restitution after Rutherford pled guilty to conspiracy to commit criminal m......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT