Brekke v. City of Sioux Falls
Decision Date | 07 March 1949 |
Docket Number | 9003. |
Citation | 36 N.W.2d 406,72 S.D. 446 |
Parties | BREKKE v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS et al. |
Court | South Dakota Supreme Court |
Stordahl, May & Boe and Roy E. Willy, all of Sioux Falls, for appellant.
T J. Slattery, of St. Paul, Minn., H. F. Chapman and Roy D Burns, both of Sioux Falls, for interveners and respondents.
Ch. 290, Laws of 1939, providing for the abandonment of a drainage district and its works, is as follows:
Purporting to act under the provisions of the above law, petitioners filed with the county commissioners of Minnehaha County on March 19, 1945, a petition stating they owned more than three-fourths of all the lands affected by Minnehaha County drainage ditch No. 1 and 2 and asked for the abandonment of such drainage district and its works. Attached to the petition and made a part thereof is a list alleged in the petition as giving the names and last known post office address of all of the owners of all of the lands affected by such drainage and theretofore assessed for its construction or maintenance. This list attached and made a part of the petition sets forth the acreage of each tract involved with the exception of the acreage of lots and blocks located principally in the city of Sioux Falls. The petition, together with the attached list made a part thereof, discloses that with the exception of the lots and blocks in Sioux Falls, there were 15726.61 acres affected by the drainage and theretofore assessed for its construction or maintenance. According to the acreage as set forth in the petition and the attached list the petition is signed by purported owners of 11862.41 acres. Following the filing of the petition the county commissioners failed or neglected to fix a time for hearing upon the petition and thereafter several of the petitioners proceeded in circuit court in mandamus to compel the commissioners to fix a time for hearing. Before the return date in the mandamus proceeding the commissioners did fix a day for hearing on the petition and gave notice thereof. Thereafter and before the time fixed for hearing on the petition the respondents in this proceeding, the City of Sioux Falls and the Great Northern Railway Company, had issued by the circuit court of Minnehaha County an alternative writ of prohibition which prohibited the holding of the hearing upon the petition. The question raised in the prohibition proceeding was the constitutionality of Ch. 290, Laws of 1939, which was finally determined by this court in the case of Great Northern Railway Company v. Graff, S.D., 28 N.W.2d 77. Following the decision in the prohibition action the county commissioners proceeded to a hearing upon the petition and on July 29, 1947, the commissioners denied the petition for the abandonment of the drainage district. The petitioners for abandonment appealed to the circuit court of Minnehaha County and the City of Sioux Falls and the Great Northern Railway Company were granted leave to intervene in the appeal. The circuit court dismissed the appeal for the reason as found by the trial court, '* * * that the petition for abandonment of Drainage Ditch No. 1 and 2, filed with the County Auditor of Minnehaha County, South Dakota, March 19, 1945, was not signed by persons owning more than three-fourths of all of the lands affected by said Drainage Ditch No. 1 and 2, and was insufficient to confer upon the Board of County Commissioners of said Minnehaha County jurisdiction of the subject matter of said proceeding * * *'. The petitioners have appealed to this court from the order of dismissal.
It appears that when respondents were permitted to intervene upon the appeal taken by the petitioners to circuit court that respondents first filed in the proceedings complaints in intervention which purported to raise an issue upon the merits of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial