Breland v. Lemastus
| Decision Date | 03 October 1938 |
| Docket Number | 33313 |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
| Parties | BRELAND v. LEMASTUS et al |
APPEAL from the chancery court of Sunflower county HON, J. L. WILLIAMS, Chancellor.
Action between J. J. Breland, trustee, and C. S. Lemastus and others. To secure a review of certain rulings, the former attempts to appeal. Appeal dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
All the matters passed upon by the chancery court, and in regard to which this interlocutory appeal was attempted to be allowed, appertain to the procedural or adjective side of the law, and we have repeatedly held that such rulings are not within the interlocutory appeals statute, Code 1930, sec. 14. Stirling v. Whitney Nat. Bank, 170 Miss. 674, 684, 150 So. 654; Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Rushing, 175 Miss. 826, 831, 167 So. 784; Marquette Cement Mfg. Co. v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 174 Miss. 843, 845, 165 So. 615; Love v. Love, 158 Miss. 785, 787, 131 So. 280.
If it may be said that the demurrer of the Indianola Production Credit Association went further than as to questions merely of practice or procedure, the reply is that the only interest the last named defendant could have, would be as a mortgagee, and the record shows that its mortgage was satisfied and cancelled on December 9, 1937,--leaving, therefore, as to that defendant only a moot issue.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Garraway v. State ex rel. Dale
...... his appeal up. . . Hamner. v. Lbr. Co., 100 Miss. 349, 56 So. 466; Breland v. Lemastus, 183 So. 500. . . It. seems to us that even if the statute by any possible [184. Miss. 470] stretch of reason is ......
-
Mcmanus v. Craig, State Tax Collector
...Cement Mfg. Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 174 Miss. 843, 165 So. 615; Dunn v. Dent, 176 Miss. 786, 170 So. 299; Breland v. Lemastus, 183 Miss. 150, 183 So. 500. May Byrd, of Jackson, for appellee. Appellants say that the State Tax Collector has no right to maintain this suit, although ......
-
Lott v. Windham
...... Mfg. Co. v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., 174 Miss. 843, 165. So. 615; Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Rushing, 175 Miss. 826, 167 So. 784; Breland v. Lemastus, 183 Miss. 150, 183 So. 500. . . The. demurrer raised and the interlocutory decree thereon. adjudicated merely a ......
-
Prine v. Smith
...cause, as contemplated by Section 14, Code 1930, but, indeed, none at all. The appeal therefore must be dismissed.' In Breland v. Lemastus, 183 Miss. 150, 183 So. 500, the Court said: 'All the matters passed upon by the chancery court, and in regard to which this interlocutory appeal was at......