Brennan v. Brennan

Decision Date20 December 1974
Docket NumberNo. 11451,11451
CitationBrennan v. Brennan, 224 N.W.2d 192, 88 S.D. 541 (S.D. 1974)
PartiesGermaine S. BRENNAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jerry G. BRENNAN, Defendant and Appellant.
Writing for the CourtHANSON; HANSON, Retired Justice, sitting for DOYLE
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

Jerry G. Brennan, pro se.

Jon W. Mattson, Deadwood, for plaintiff and respondent.

HANSON, Retired Justice. *

In this action for divorce defendant appeals from that portion of the final decree ordering payment of plaintiff's attorneys fees and expenses.

On March 11, 1974, the day set for trial, plaintiff proved her cause of action for divorce by default pursuant to a stipulation entered into by the parties in open court. Among other matters the stipulation provided:

'It is further contemplated and stipulated that counsel for the plaintiff shall submit his itemization for fees (for) the Judge's consideration and determination and that the parties shall not stipulate thereto; such being left to the future determination by the Court.'

The final decree was signed March 22, 1974, and filed March 26, 1974. A few days before it was filed defendant received a copy of the proposed decree which contained a blank space for the amount of attorneys fees to be allowed. Along with the proposed decree was an itemized statement of requested fees and expenses from the plaintiff's attorney. The requested charges amounted to $3,066.07, which amount was adopted by the court ex parte and inserted in the final decree. Immediately upon receipt of the proposed decree and the attorney's statement, defendant filed written objections and requested a hearing. This was denied.

A trial court is expressly authorized 'to order payment of attorneys' fees in all cases of divorce * * * where the allowance of the same before or after judgment shall seem warranted and necessary to the court'. SDCL 15--17--7. Also see SDCL 25--4--38. Although the allowance of attorney fees rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, its authority to enter a valid order for payment is conditioned upon compliance with procedural due process and fundamental fairness. A notice of motion for counsel fees is ordinarily required. See Anno. 'Suit Money-Notice-Hearing' 10 A.L.R.3d 292. In accord with this general rule an award of counsel fees made without proper application and without notice to defendant was set aside in Cameron v. Cameron, 30 S.D. 634, 139 N.W. 329.

At the time defendant entered into the stipulation regarding plaintiff's attorney fees their nature and amount were unknown to him. The stipulation...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Jones v. Jones
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • January 20, 1983
    ...notice to defendant was set aside in Cameron v. Cameron, 30 S.D. 634, 139 N.W. 329 (1913). (citation omitted) Brennan v. Brennan, 88 S.D. 541, 224 N.W.2d 192, 193 (1974). In Lien, supra, the trial court had an itemized statement of the services rendered by the attorney, but no showing of ti......
  • Shoop v. Shoop, 16890
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • May 21, 1990
    ...Attorney fees may be awarded only "upon compliance with procedural due process and fundamental fairness." Brennan v. Brennan, 88 S.D. 541, 543, 224 N.W.2d 192, 193 (S.D.1974). This requires proper application for the fees and notice of the request to the defendant. Id. In a post-hearing let......
  • Kappenman v. Kappenman
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1994
    ...Attorney fees must be awarded only "upon compliance with due procedural due process and fundamental fairness." Brennan v. Brennan, 88 S.D. 541, 543, 224 N.W.2d 192, 193 (S.D.1974). This requires proper application for the fees and notice of the request to the defendant. Id. However, the thi......
  • Am. Legion Home Ass'n Post 22 v. Pennington Cnty.
    • United States
    • South Dakota Supreme Court
    • October 10, 2018
    ...due process and fundamental fairness." Kappenman v. Kappenman, 522 N.W.2d 199, 203 (S.D. 1994) (quoting Brennan v. Brennan, 88 S.D. 541, 543, 224 N.W.2d 192, 193 (1974)). The County had adequate notice and opportunity to contest attorney fees sought. Therefore, American Legion's failure to ......
  • Get Started for Free