Brevard Cnty. v. Morehead, 5D15–2872.

Decision Date18 December 2015
Docket NumberNo. 5D15–2872.,5D15–2872.
Citation181 So.3d 1229
Parties BREVARD COUNTY, Florida, Petitioner, v. Louis C. MOREHEAD, III, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Scott L. Knox, Office of the County Attorney, Viera, for Petitioner.

W. Bruce DelValle, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

WALLIS, J.

Brevard County (the "County") petitions this Court for a writ of prohibition. The County argues the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in ruling that it was not entitled to sovereign immunity from claims for implied contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment brought by Respondent, Louis C. Morehead, III. We grant the County's petition, quash the trial court's order denying the County's substituted motion for partial summary judgment, and remand with instructions to dismiss Counts I, II, and III of Morehead's complaint.

This dispute concerns property located in Brevard County known as the J–2 Lift Station ("Lift Station"). General Development Corporation ("GDC") initially constructed and developed the Lift Station in 1968 as an integral component of the sanitary sewer system within the former Port St. John, Brevard County, Florida development/community being operated by General Development Utilities ("GDU"), a private utility enterprise.

In 1985, the County contracted with GDC and GDU, paying $100,000 to acquire the water and sanitary sewer plant in the Port St. John area.1 GDC allowed the County to use the Lift Station for public sewer purposes serving GDC's Port St. John development. GDC transferred the Port St. John sanitary sewer plant to the County by special warranty deed. Since 1985, the County has operated the Lift Station with the consent of GDC and its successor, Atlantic Gulf Utilities Corporation, and has expended substantial sums for the maintenance and improvement of the Lift Station. In 1997, Morehead purchased the property from Mitchell S. Goldman, who in turn had previously purchased the property from Atlantic Gulf.

In 1998, Regency Realty Group, Inc. sued Morehead, Goldman, and the County to determine ownership status of the property that included the Lift Station. The County brought a cross-claim against Morehead for an irrevocable license, dedication, equitable title or equitable conversion, implied easement, and appurtenant easement. The County alleged: (1) it became the owner and operator of the Port St. John sanitary sewer system pursuant to its agreement with GDC and GDU; (2) the Lift Station is an integral and essential part of the sanitary sewer system; (3) the parties recorded a special warranty deed transferring the Port St. John sanitary sewer plant to the County; (4) its use and occupation of the disputed Lift Station has been open, obvious, and notorious since 1985; and (5) it spent more than $181,000 for the maintenance and improvement of the Lift Station. The County further alleged that Morehead obtained a copy of the Lift Station improvements from the County's records and that the description of improvements was later attached to the deed from Goldman to Morehead.

Morehead filed a counter-crossclaim for inverse condemnation and trespass. Morehead did not allege implied contract, unjust enrichment, or quantum meruit. After a non-jury trial on September 18, 2003, the trial court entered a final judgment, holding that the 1985 contract executed by GDC, GDU, the City of Cocoa, and the County constituted an irrevocable license from GDC and GDU, covering the Lift Station. The court further determined that, prior to purchase, Morehead had actual and constructive notice of the license and the County's rights to construct, operate, and maintain the Lift Station. The trial court denied Morehead's claims for inverse condemnation and trespass. Morehead did not appeal.

In 2007, Morehead filed the present suit, alleging inverse condemnation, which the trial court found barred by res judicata. Morehead's third amended complaint sought damages for implied contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment based on the County's occupation and use of Morehead's land for the operation of the Lift Station (Counts I, II, and III). Morehead also sought injunctive relief (Count IV). The complaint alleged the County's liability to Morehead "in implied contract" arises under the common law, the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and Article Ten, Section Six of the Florida Constitution, which prohibit the taking of private property without the payment of just compensation. In his complaint, Morehead conceded that he has no written, express contract with the County, but alleged an implied agreement based on the parties' conduct.

In August 2014, the County moved for partial summary judgment, arguing Counts I, II, and III were barred because they arose out of the same transaction or occurrence that was the subject matter of the original suit. The trial court denied the County's motion, and this court declined certiorari review. The County then filed a substituted motion for partial summary judgment as to Counts I, II, and III, arguing it receives the protection of sovereign immunity.2 On July 29, 2015, the trial court denied the County's substituted motion for partial summary judgment. Although the trial court admitted that the County raised a meritorious sovereign immunity defense, it determined that Morehead asserted disputed material facts, precluding the trial court from granting summary judgment.3 This petition for writ of prohibition follows.

"Prohibition is an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Sarasota Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist. v. Venice HMA, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 September 2021
    ...a writ of certiorari to review the denial of a motion to dismiss involving tribal sovereign immunity); Brevard County v. Morehead , 181 So. 3d 1229, 1232-33 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (issuing prohibition to address a claim of sovereign immunity); Miami–Dade County v. Rodriguez , 67 So.3d 1213, 12......
  • Sarasota Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist. & Sarasota Cnty. v. Venice HMA, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 16 June 2021
    ...a writ of certiorari to review the denial of a motion to dismiss involving tribal sovereign immunity); Brevard County v. Morehead, 181 So. 3d 1229, 1232-33 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (issuing prohibition to address a claim of sovereign immunity); Miami-Dade County v. Rodriguez, 67 So.3d 1213, 1216......
  • Veolia Water N. Am. - S., LLC v. City of Everglades City, Case No: 2:18-cv-785-FtM-99UAM
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 30 April 2019
    ...claims such as unjust enrichment. City of Fort Lauderdale v. Israel, 178 So. 3d 444, 446-48 (4th DCA 2015); Brevard County v. Morehead, 181 So. 3d 1229, 1232-33 (5th DCA 2015). The Motion to Dismiss Count III based on sovereign immunity is granted. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: Defendant'......
  • Goldstein v. Univ. of Cent. Fla. Bd. of Trs.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 August 2023
    ... ... force." Brevard County v. Morehead, 181 So.3d ... 1229, 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT