Brewer v. Mo. Title Loans, Inc.

Docket NumberSC90647
Decision Date06 March 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
62 cases
  • Vargas v. SAI Monrovia B, Inc.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 2013
    ...supra, 131 S.Ct. at pp. 1746, 1750 ; see Cruz v. Cingular Wireless, LLC (11th Cir.2011) 648 F.3d 1205, 1211 ; Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans (Mo.2012) 364 S.W.3d 486, 489 ; see also Marmet Health Care Center v. Brown (2012) 565 U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 1201, 1203–1204, 182 L.Ed.2d 42.) Californ......
  • Feeney v. Dell Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 12, 2013
    ...if the majority intended to establish a rule completely preempting all state law unconscionability defenses.” Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486, 490–491 (Mo.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 191, 184 L.Ed.2d 38 (2012). This view is further supported by the clear inferen......
  • Berent v. CMH Homes, Inc.
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • June 5, 2015
    ...all of the facts and circumstances of a particular case.” Dan Ryan Builders, Inc., 737 S.E.2d at 558 ; Brewer v. Mo. Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486, 495–96 (Mo.2012) ; Vincent v. Neyer, 139 Ohio App.3d 848, 745 N.E.2d 1127, 1133 (2000) (declining to extend Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co., 83 Ohio S......
  • State ex rel. Pinkerton v. Fahnestock
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 2017
    ...such arbitration agreement. While this Court has held unconscionability is a state law defense to contract formation, see Brewer v. Mo. Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486, 493 (Mo. banc 2012), conscionability is not an essential element of contract formation. As recognized by the Supreme Court, un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Life After Concepcion: Two Courts Reach Different Results
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • December 10, 2012
    ...132 S.Ct. 1046 (2012). The Supreme Court of Missouri reached quite a different result on remand in Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. 2012). There, the plaintiff had borrowed $2,215 from the title company in a loan that was secured by her automobile and where the annual per......
9 books & journal articles
  • State Consumer Protection Laws
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Consumer Protection Law Developments (Second) - Volume II
    • February 2, 2016
    ...Inc., 429 S.W.3d 497 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). 2039. Robinson v. Title Lenders, 364 S.W.3d 505 (Mo. 2012); Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. 2012). 2040. 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011). 2041. 364 S.W.3d 505 (Mo. 2012). 2042. Lopez , 429 S.W.3d at 500-02 (citing Concepcion , 131 S. Ct. ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Consumer Protection Law Developments (Second) - Volume II
    • February 2, 2016
    ...Mar. 12, 2014), 169 Breslow v. Wells Fargo, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10623 (11th Cir. June 9, 2014), 329 Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. 2012), 977 Brewster Wallcovering Co. v. Blue Mountain Wallcoverings, Inc., 864 N.E.2d 518 (Mass. App. Ct. 2007), 936 Brice v. AT&T Commc’n......
  • Chapter § 3.02 CRUISE SHIPS
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Travel Law
    • Invalid date
    ...See De Souza v. The Solomon Partnership, Inc., 88 Mass. App. Ct. 1107 (Mass. App. 2015).[191] See Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486 (Mo. Sup. En Banc 2012) (unconscionable and unenforceable).[192] See Hobbs v. Tamko, 2015 WL 6457837 (Mo. App. 2015) (customers did not accept ter......
  • A Contractual Dilemma: Where Arbitration Agreements and Delegation Provisions Collide.
    • United States
    • Missouri Law Review Vol. 86 No. 2, March 2021
    • March 22, 2021
    ...to be invalid." Eaton v. CMH Homes, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 426, 432-33 (Mo. 2015) (en banc) (citing Brewer v. Missouri Title Loans, 364 S.W.3d 486, 492, n.3 (Mo. 2012) (en banc)). Instead, "[i]t is more accurate to state that a court will look at both the procedural and substantive aspects of a c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT