Breytspraak v. Gordon

Decision Date25 February 1948
Docket NumberGen. No. 44150.
PartiesBREYTSPRAAK v. GORDON et al.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Superior Court, Cook County; Rudolph F. Desort, Judge.

Action to recover damages for malicious prosecution of a civil suit by Victor C. Breytspraak against Martin M. Gordon and Patricia Gordon. From an order sustaining defendants' motion to strike the amended complaint and dismissing the cause, the plaintiff appeals.

Order affirmed.

See also 328 Ill.App. 581, 66 N.E.2d 457.

G. A. Bosomburg, of Chicago, for appellant.

Joseph B. Quinn and James A. Harrington, both of Chicago, for appellees.

LEWE, Presiding Justice.

(Publish abstract only.)

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Howard v. Firmand
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • December 17, 2007
    ...cause for instituting that action, even though that judgment was subsequently reversed on appeal"), citing Breytspraak v. Gordon, 333 Ill.App. 650, 77 N.E.2d 860 (1948) (abstract of op.). "`The rationale for drawing the inference of conclusiveness' * * * `appears to be that a competent trib......
  • Sherrod v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • July 24, 1978
    ...461-4624, 181 N.E.2d 601; Hargadine v. Sharkey, C.A.Ill. (1956), 8 Ill.App.2d 209, 2266, 131 N.E.2d 134; Breytspraak v. Gordon, C.A.Ill. (1948), 333 Ill.App. 650, 77 N.E.2d 860; Ligitos v. Finerman, C.A.Ill. (1946), 329 Ill.App. 241, 67 N.E.2d 610. A conviction in an underlying criminal pro......
  • Keefe v. Aluminum Co. of America
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • January 19, 1988
    ...Ill.Dec. 797, 409 N.E.2d 412.) In certain circumstances, however, probable cause may exist as a matter of law. In Breytspraak v. Gordon (1948), 333 Ill.App. 650, 77 N.E.2d 860, the court held that a civil judgment entered by the circuit court in a prior action constituted conclusive evidenc......
  • Siebrand v. Eyerly Aircraft Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Oregon
    • July 22, 1960
    ...325; Ligitsos v. Finerman, 329 Ill.App. 241, 67 N.E.2d 610; Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co., 175 Ill. 619, 51 N.E. 569; Breytspraak v. Gordon, 333 Ill.App. 650, 77 N.E.2d 860. It seems that the reason for the rule is that courts should be open to litigants for settlement of their rights without......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT