Brickley v. Progressive Northern Ins. Co., No. 2009-389.

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
Writing for the CourtCONBOY
Citation7 A.3d 1215,160 N.H. 625
Docket NumberNo. 2009-389.
Decision Date19 August 2010
PartiesRichard BRICKLEY and another v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY.
7 A.3d 1215
160 N.H. 625


Richard BRICKLEY and another
v.
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY.


No. 2009-389.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Argued: March 24, 2010.
Opinion Issued: Aug. 19, 2010.

7 A.3d 1216

Mulvey Professional Association, of Portsmouth (Patrick A. Mulvey on the memorandum of law and orally), for the plaintiffs.

Wiggin & Nourie, P.A., of Manchester (Gordon A. Rehnborg, Jr. and Mary Ann Dempsey on the brief, and Mr. Rehnborg orally), for the defendant.

CONBOY, J.

160 N.H. 626

In this declaratory judgment proceeding, the defendant, Progressive Northern Insurance Company (Progressive), appeals an order of the Superior Court ( McHugh, J.) denying its motion for summary judgment and granting partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Richard Brickley and Richard Brickley as father and next friend of Cory Brickley. The trial court found that the term "motor vehicle" in the "Uninsured Motorist Coverage" section of the Brickley family's motor vehicle insurance policy was ambiguous and concluded that coverage was required under the policy. We affirm.

The following facts are not in dispute. On April 30, 2008, Cory Brickley (Cory), a minor, was involved in an accident while operating a 2006 Kymco MXU 250 all-terrain vehicle (ATV). As Cory exited from his parents' driveway on Pingree Hill Road in Auburn, he was struck by a Chevrolet Corvette driven by James Russell, an uninsured motorist. The ATV that Cory was operating was owned by his father, Richard, and designed for use and operation principally off public roads. At the

7 A.3d 1217
time of the accident, Cory resided with his parents, Richard and Mary Brickley.

Progressive denied the Brickleys' claim for coverage under an automobile insurance policy, effective April 30, 2008 (the policy), issued to Mary Brickley, the named insured. The policy explicitly insures two automobiles, a 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander SE and a 2002 Mercury Grand Marquis LS, and provides five types of coverage described under separate headings. Richard Brickley (Brickley) filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment that Progressive was obligated to provide coverage under Part II of the policy for medical payments and Part III for uninsured motorist coverage. Progressive moved for summary judgment contending that it is not required to provide medical payments coverage because Cory does not meet the definition of an "insured person" under the policy, and that it is not required to provide uninsured motorist coverage because the accident fell within the policy's "household exclusion." Brickley filed a cross-motion for summary judgment arguing, in part, that the ATV Cory was operating is not a "motor vehicle" as defined under the household exclusion and

160 N.H. 627
therefore Progressive is obligated to provide uninsured motorist coverage. The trial court ruled that Cory is not an "insured person" as defined in the policy and as a result Progressive is not obligated to provide medical payments coverage. The court also ruled that the term "motor vehicle" in the household exclusion is ambiguous and resolved the ambiguity in favor of the plaintiffs, requiring Progressive to provide uninsured motorist coverage. Progressive appealed.

"We review de novo the trial court's application of the law to the facts in its summary judgment ruling." Progressive N. Ins. Co. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins. Co., 151 N.H. 649, 652, 864 A.2d 368 (2005). We consider all of the evidence presented in the record, and all inferences properly drawn therefrom, in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Id. "If our review of that evidence discloses no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, then we will affirm the grant of summary...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Great Am. Dining, Inc. v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2012–088.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • February 25, 2013
    ...provides coverage, the policy contains an ambiguity and will be construed against the insurer." Brickley v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 160 N.H. 625, 627, 7 A.3d 1215 (2010) (quotation omitted).164 N.H. 617 The interpretation of an insurance policy, like any contract, is an issue of law f......
  • DAE Aviation Enters., Corp. v. Old Republic Ins. Co., Civil No. 11-cv-554-LM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of New Hampshire
    • August 31, 2012
    ...construed against thePage 16insurer." MacLearn v. Commerce Ins. Co., 163 N.H. 241, 244 (2012) (quoting Brickley v. Prog. N. Ins. Co., 160 N.H. 625, 627 (2010)). B. Preliminary Matters The court begins by clearing away some underbrush. First, Cardelli argues that "[i]t is well esta......
  • Motorists Commercial Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hartwell, 21-1603
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • November 23, 2022
    ...provides coverage, the policy contains an ambiguity and will be construed against the insurer." Brickley v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 7 A.3d 1215, 1217 (N.H. (quoting Cath. Med. Ctr. v. Exec. Risk Indem., 867 A.2d 453, (N.H. 2005)). III. On appeal, both the Lynnway defendants and the vi......
  • Catholic Med. Ctr. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., Civil No. 14-cv-180-JL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of New Hampshire
    • June 1, 2015
    ...and in context, the court finds that the term refers to the physical structure of the hospital. Cf. Brickley v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 160 N.H. 625, 629 (2010) (finding ambiguity where terms were defined inconsistently in different parts of insurance policy). Indeed, it would make little ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • Great Am. Dining, Inc. v. Phila. Indem. Ins. Co., No. 2012–088.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • February 25, 2013
    ...provides coverage, the policy contains an ambiguity and will be construed against the insurer." Brickley v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 160 N.H. 625, 627, 7 A.3d 1215 (2010) (quotation omitted).164 N.H. 617 The interpretation of an insurance policy, like any contract, is an issue of law f......
  • DAE Aviation Enters., Corp. v. Old Republic Ins. Co., Civil No. 11-cv-554-LM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of New Hampshire
    • August 31, 2012
    ...construed against thePage 16insurer." MacLearn v. Commerce Ins. Co., 163 N.H. 241, 244 (2012) (quoting Brickley v. Prog. N. Ins. Co., 160 N.H. 625, 627 (2010)). B. Preliminary Matters The court begins by clearing away some underbrush. First, Cardelli argues that "[i]t is well esta......
  • Motorists Commercial Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hartwell, 21-1603
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • November 23, 2022
    ...provides coverage, the policy contains an ambiguity and will be construed against the insurer." Brickley v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 7 A.3d 1215, 1217 (N.H. (quoting Cath. Med. Ctr. v. Exec. Risk Indem., 867 A.2d 453, (N.H. 2005)). III. On appeal, both the Lynnway defendants and the vi......
  • Catholic Med. Ctr. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., Civil No. 14-cv-180-JL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of New Hampshire
    • June 1, 2015
    ...and in context, the court finds that the term refers to the physical structure of the hospital. Cf. Brickley v. Progressive N. Ins. Co., 160 N.H. 625, 629 (2010) (finding ambiguity where terms were defined inconsistently in different parts of insurance policy). Indeed, it would make little ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT