Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co.
| Decision Date | 04 January 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 07–210.,07–210. |
| Citation | 169 L.Ed.2d 625,76 USLW 3339,552 U.S. 1087,76 USLW 3330,76 USLW 3073,128 S.Ct. 829 |
| Parties | John BRIDGE, et al., petitioners, v. PHOENIX BOND & INDEMNITY CO., et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Case below, 477 F.3d 928.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted limited to the following question: “Whether reliance is a required element of a RICO claim predicated on mail fraud and, if it is, whether that reliance must be by the plaintiff.” Brief of petitioners to be filed on or before Thursday, February 14, 2008. Brief of respondents to be filed on or before Wednesday, March 12, 2008. Reply brief, if any, to be filed in accordance with Rule 25.3 of the Rules of this Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
1 books & journal articles
-
A Phoenix Rising
...He can be reached at edward. marshall@agg.com. --------- Notes: [1] 128 S. Ct. 2131 (2008). [2] Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co., 128 S. Ct. 829 (2008) (granting certiorari). [3] "The substantive elements of mail fraud and wire fraud are identical." Sikes v. Teleline, Inc., 281 F.3d 1350......