O'Brien v. Schayer

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
CitationO'Brien v. Schayer, 124 Mass. 211 (Mass. 1878)
Decision Date11 March 1878
PartiesWilliam P. O'Brien v. Caroline Schayer

Suffolk. Tort for the obstruction of a passageway.

At the trial in the Superior Court, before Putnam, J., it appeared that James A. Pearson, the owner of adjacent lots of land called lots 12 and 13 on a certain plan, on Sixth Street in Boston, conveyed on May 1, 1861, by a warranty deed, recorded on June 28, 1861, to William P. Houston and Samuel H. L Pierce, lot 13, referring to that plan, "subject and entitled to a common use with the estate adjoining southeasterly (being lot twelve) of the passageway from Sixth Street, about three feet and ten inches wide on the southeasterly side of the granted land;" that on August 25, 1868, the plaintiff, by mesne conveyances, all of which contained the same clause, became the owner of lot 13; that on December 19, 1863, Pearson, by a quitclaim deed, conveyed to Alpheus M. Stetson lot 12, which, by mesne conveyances was conveyed on April 15, 1869, to the defendant's husband, Philip Schayer, under whom the defendant claimed but none of the deeds under which the defendant claimed title referred to the passageway, and none appeared on the plan referred to. It also appeared that there had existed a passageway, three feet and ten inches wide, between the houses on lots 12 and 13, from the time the houses on the two lots were erected in the winter of 1860 and 1861; that there had been no changes in the boundaries of the passageway, which had been used by the plaintiff and his grantors until the act complained of; that there was at no time any other passageway on or adjoining the plaintiff's lot; that the division line between the two lots ran through...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Morris v. Blunt
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1916
    ...it will be deemed that the way intended by the grantor is the one actually in existence. Gerrish v. Shattuck, 128 Mass. 571; O'Brien v. Schayer, 124 Mass. 211; Peabody v. Chandler, 17 Misc. 655, N.Y.S. 1028; Bannon v. Angier, 2 Allen (Mass.) 128. This rule of law is well established, and is......
  • Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Kelley
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 1938
    ...Co., 200 Ala. 126, 75 So. 574; Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber Co., 164 Ark. 261, 261 S.W. 645; Gerrish v. Shattuck, 128 Mass. 571; O'Brien v. Schayer, 124 Mass. 211; Peabody v. Chandler, 40 N.Y.S. 1028; Morris Blunt, 40 Utah 243, 161 P. 1127; Eureka Land Co. v. Watts, 119 Va. 506, 89 S.E. 986; Li......
  • Prudential Ins. Co. v. Kelley
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 1938
    ...Co., 200 Ala. 126, 75 So. 574; Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber Co., 164 Ark. 261, 261 S.W. 645; Gerrish v. Shattuck, 128 Mass. 571; O'Brien v. Schayer, 124 Mass. 211; Peabody v. Chandler, 40 N.Y. Sup. 1028; Morris v. Blunt, 40 Utah, 243, 161 Pac. 1127; Eureka Land Co. v. Watts, 119 Va. 506, 89 S.E......
  • Anderson v. De Vries
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • June 12, 1950
    ...some sixty feet east of the westerly boundary of this lot. See Hart v. Western R. Corp., 13 Metc. 99, 104, 46 Am.Dec. 719; O'Brien v. Schayer, 124 Mass. 211, 212; Commonwealth v. Franklin, 133 Mass. 569, 570; O'Brien v. Murphy, 189 Mass. 353, 355-356, 75 N.E. 700; Lipsky v. Heller, 199 Mass......
  • Get Started for Free