Brillhart v. Mish
Citation | 58 A. 28,99 Md. 447 |
Parties | BRILLHART et al. v. MISH et al. |
Decision Date | 09 June 1904 |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County, in Equity; M.L. Keedy Judge.
Action by Mary C. Resh and others against George W. Brillhart and others for the partition of real property. A sale was had under a decree in favor of plaintiffs, and the purchaser Frank W. Mish, and another filed exceptions. From an order sustaining certain of the exceptions W.B. Brillhart and others appeal. Reversed.
Alexander Armstrong, Jr., and Norman B. Scott, Jr., for appellants.
A.C Strite, for appellees.
The appeal in this case is from an order of the circuit court for Washington county sustaining exceptions to a sale made under a decree of that court and setting aside the sale. The facts which give rise to the questions that are involved in the litigation are that Sarah J. Brillhart, of Washington county died in 1898, leaving surviving her her husband, John W Brillhart, a son, George William Brillhart, and a daughter, Mary C. Resh, the wife of Franklin D. Resh. She died intestate, seised and possessed of several parcels of real estate situated in Washington county, and of a farm in Berkeley county, W.Va. On the 18th of November, 1899, her surviving husband, John W. Brillhart, executed to one Samuel P. Angle a deed, in which it was recited: It then granted and provided as follows: It is further provided that the said Angle shall on the 1st day of January in each year, or within 15 days thereafter, make settlement in the circuit court of the county of all moneys received and expended by him, his report "to be under oath and subject to exceptions, as other accounts formerly stated by the auditor" of the court in chancery cases; that he shall pay to said Brillhart such sums during the year as may be necessary for his own comfortable maintenance, and shall expend for the personal benefit and comfort of said Brillhart, such other sums for medicines, medical advice, clothing, traveling expenses, etc., as he may require, not to exceed on the average $30 per month, but, if a greater sum be needed, it should be paid, but not until the end of the year, when the annual settlement is made in the circuit court--it being the intent "that all expenditures necessary for the comfortable maintenance and health" of the said Brillhart "shall be made in reason and without stint"; that the said Angle should give bond, etc.; that he should receive compensation for his services at the rate of 5 per cent. on expenditures and the same on his receipts; that the trust should be irrevocable, and should supersede all powers of attorney previously made. The said Angle agreed to accept the trust subject to the conditions and provisions set out in the deed, and to consult with the said Brillhart "and receive his advice about the management of farms, and endeavor to the fullest extent possible to adopt the views" of said Brillhart, "and have him co-operate with the said trustee"; but it was to be expressly understood the judgment of the said Angle should be always paramount. This deed was acknowledged and recorded. On the 12th of October, 1903, John W. Brillhart executed what was intended to be a revocation of the deed which has been referred to and recited. On the 17th of October, 1903, Mary C. Resh and her husband filed in the circuit court for Washington county a bill in equity alleging the death of Sarah J. Brillhart intestate and possessed of the real estate which has been mentioned; that she left surviving her John W. Brillhart, her husband, and two adult children, the said Mary C. Resh and George W. Brillhart; that the undivided interest of the said Mary C. Resh in the real estate left by the said Sarah J. Brillhart had been conveyed to her husband and coplaintiff, Franklin D. Resh, and that of the said George W. Brillhart to his wife, Iva M. Brillhart; that the said real estate was not susceptible of partition without loss and injury; and praying a decree for a sale of the same for the purpose of partition. To this bill John W. Brillhart and George William Brillhart and the latter's wife, Iva M. Brillhart, were made defendants, and were the only defendants. John W. Brillhart filed his separate answer thereto, admitting "all the matters and things" stated therein, and consenting to a sale, and that the lands should "be sold free of his interest as surviving husband, provided that he receive from the sale of said lands the amount of money allowed a surviving husband" by the equity rules of the court. George W. Brillhart and his wife filed their joint answer, admitting the allegations of the bill, consenting to a decree for sale, and agreeing that out of such of the proceeds of sale as might be distributed to the share of Iva M. Brillhart there might be paid "the liens existing against" the "respondents, or either of them, *** until they are wholly satisfied and discharged." A decree for a sale of the lands in question was thereupon passed. After the decree had been passed, certain judgment and mortgage creditors of Franklin D. Resh and wife and of George W. Brillhart and wife entered voluntary appearances in the cause and filed answers averring themselves willing that the lands decreed to be sold might be sold free of their liens, provided...
To continue reading
Request your trial