BRITISH STEEL CORPORATION v. United States, Court No. 83-7-01032.

Decision Date04 May 1987
Docket NumberCourt No. 83-7-01032.
Citation661 F. Supp. 68
PartiesBRITISH STEEL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants, Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corporation, et al., Defendants-Intervenors.
CourtU.S. Court of International Trade
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEWMAN, Senior Judge:

In this action, plaintiffs appealed (CAFC App. No. 87-1050) from an order of this court entered on October 17, 1986 denying plaintiffs' application for a preliminary injunction seeking to enjoin the government from liquidating certain entries of stainless steel plates from the United Kingdom pending an administrative review of the period. British Steel Corporation v. United States, 12 CIT ___, 647 F.Supp. 928 (1986). The government moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of mootness. The decision of the Federal Circuit discloses that "the government has now begun an administrative review and has suspended liquidation of entries for the period." Slip Op. at 2.

In the Federal Circuit, plaintiffs urged, inter alia, that the appellate court in dismissing the action, should direct this court to vacate its order of October 17, 1986, citing United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950). In opposition, the government contended Munsingwear holds that the "judgment" or "order" below should be vacated, but not the entire opinion.

In its order dismissing the appeal as moot, the Federal Circuit, citing Munsingwear, observed that "the purpose of vacating the judgment or order is to avoid the hardship of res judicata. In accordance with the purpose thereof, that portion of the Court of International Trade's opinion that denied British Steel's application for a preliminary injunction will be vacated." Slip Op. at 3 (emphasis added.) The Federal Circuit, therefore, ordered:

(2) The Court of International Trade is directed to vacate that part of its decision which denied British Steel's application for preliminary injunction. (Emphasis added.)

Following the foregoing directive of the Federal Circuit, it is hereby ORDERED:

That portion of this court's decision of October 17, 1986 that denied plaintiffs' application for preliminary injunction is vacated.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Ipsco, Inc. v. US, Court No. 86-06-00753.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • July 21, 1988
    ...928 (1986), appeal dismissed as moot, No. 87-1050 (Fed.Cir. Mar. 31, 1987) (due to intervening agency action), vacated in part, 11 CIT ___, 661 F.Supp. 68 (1987), dismissed, 12 CIT ___, Slip Op. 88-76 (June 13, 1988) available on WESTLAW, 1988 WL 64914 (pursuant to settlement agreement). Bu......
  • Fabricas El Carmen, SA, De CV v. US
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • February 17, 1988
    ...F.Supp. 928, 930-31 (1986) appeal dismissed as moot and remanded for vacatur No. 87-1050 (Fed.Cir. April 1, 1987) vacated in part 661 F.Supp. 68 (CIT 1987) (vacating denial of preliminary injunction). See British Steel, 11 CIT ___, 649 F.Supp. 78, 80-81 (1986). A remand of an original count......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT