Broadway Music Corporation v. FR Pub. Corporation
Decision Date | 15 February 1940 |
Parties | BROADWAY MUSIC CORPORATION v. F-R PUB. CORPORATION. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Wattenberg & Wattenberg, of New York City (Sidney W. Wattenberg and Harold W. Tepfer, both of New York City, of counsel), for complainant.
Greenbaum, Wolff & Ernst, of New York City (Alexander Lindey and Harriet F. Pilpel, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.
This is a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's complaint, which seeks damages for an alleged copyright infringement.
It appears that the plaintiff is the owner of the copyright of the song "Poor Pauline", which was published in 1914, contemporary with the motion picture serial "Perils of Pauline". The weekly magazine, "The New Yorker", which the defendant publishes, in its August 13, 1938, issue, carried an article on the death of Pearl White in Paris, in which the following appeared under the title "The Talk of the Town":
The plaintiff claims thereby an infringement of its copyright on "Poor Pauline". The defendant contends that there is no infringement, and that the incidental, illustrative and fragmentary use made by the "New Yorker" is a "fair use" allowed by law.
Neither attorney has called to my attention any decisions involving facts similar to this controversy, except the case of Shapiro Bernstein & Co. v. P. F. Collier et ano.1 (decided 1934, S.D.N.Y.). This case came on before Frank J. Coleman, United States District Judge, and later an opinion was written by Judge Goddard of this Court. While the facts in that case are somewhat dissimilar to the facts found in this case, inasmuch as the use of the copyrighted song was more fragmentary there, nevertheless it seems to me the principle laid down in that case applies to the case at bar. As in the Bernstein case there is no issue of similarity involved. There is no question but that the defendant used the chorus of the song "Poor Pauline".
In the Bernstein case Judge Goddard pointed out generally some of the tests to be applied: (1) The extent and relative value of the extracts; (2) the purpose and whether the quoted portions might be used as a substitute for the original work; (3) the effect upon the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Meeropol v. Nizer
...Inc. v. Bernard Geis Associates, supra; Karll v. Curtis Publishing Co., 39 F.Supp. 836 (E.D.Wis.1941); Broadway Music v. F-R Publishing Corporation, 31 F.Supp. 817 (S.D.N.Y.1940). In such cases, a full trial by the district court would be a purposeless exercise in futility. United States v.......
-
Berlin v. EC Publications, Inc.
...artist's style of performing, in which portions of a copyrighted song were incidentally employed. Cf. Broadway Music Corp. v. F-R Pub. Corp., 31 F.Supp. 817 (S.D. N.Y.1940). Alternatively, in Hill v. Whalen & Martell, Inc., 220 F. 359 (S.D. N.Y.1914), the defense of "parody" or "burlesque" ......
-
Mura v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
...Karll v. Curtis Publishing Co., 39 F.Supp. 836 (E.D.Wis.1941). Nor can any intent to pirate be found here. Broadway Music Corp. v. F-R Pub. Corp., 31 F.Supp. 817, 818 (S.D. N.Y.1940). I conclude that the use of the hand puppets on the Captain Kangaroo Show was In view of the preceding discu......
-
Karll v. Curtis Pub. Co.
...No element of competition was present between the article and the copyrighted song. A case very much in point is Broadway Music Corp. v. F-R Pub. Corp., D.C., 31 F.Supp. 817. On the occasion of the death of the movie actress Pearl White, "The New Yorker" printed the chorus of a copyrighted ......