Brock v. First State Bank & Trust Co.

• Decision Date: 21 June 1937
• Docket Number: 34436
• Citation: 187 La. 766,175 So. 569
• Parties: BROCK, State Bank Com'r, v. FIRST STATE BANK & TRUST CO. et al
• Court: Louisiana Supreme Court

175 So. 569

187 La. 766

BROCK, State Bank Com'r, v. FIRST STATE BANK & TRUST CO. et al

No. 34436

Supreme Court of Louisiana

June 21, 1937

Rehearing Denied July 8, 1937

Rule nisi made absolute, writs perpetuated, judgment of district court annulled and set aside, exception of prematurity overruled, and case remanded for further proceedings.

Ponder & Ponder, of Amite, for relator.

Robert S. Ellis and Mary Purser, of Amite, for respondents.

OPINION

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is an action by the State Bank Commissioner in charge of the liquidation of the Tangipahoa Bank & Trust Company against the First State Bank & Trust Company, in liquidation, and Charles H. Houlton, William L. Houlton, and Richard A. Kent in solido, to recover the sum of $ 115,529.20, representing the balance due on the note of the defendant bank, guaranteed by the individual defendants.

The defendant guarantors filed an exception of prematurity on the ground that plaintiff must exhaust his remedies against the primary obligor, the maker of the note, before proceeding against those secondarily liable, the guarantors.

The exception was sustained and the suit dismissed as to the individual defendants as guarantors.

Plaintiff applied to this court for writs of prohibition, mandamus, and certiorari, which were granted, and, in response to the rule nisi, the returns of the trial judge and the respondents and the record were filed here.

The note and the guaranty sued upon and pledged to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation read as follows:

"$ 191,258.71

"Hammond La.

"June 23, 1926.

"On or before seven years after date for value received, I, we or either of us, promise to pay to the order of

"Hammond State Bank

"One Hundred Ninety One Thousand, Two Hundred Fifty Eight & 71/100 Dollars, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date until paid.

"Payable at Hammond State Bank, Hammond, La. Interest payable monthly and defaulting interest to draw the same rate of interest as principal. The makers, endorsers and guarantors of this note guarantee to pay all costs of collecting, including 10% attorney's fees if placed in the hands of an attorney for collection. If not paid at maturity the principal and makers agree that any money on deposit or otherwise to his credit may be applied to the payment of this note. We hereby severally waive presentment of payment, notice of nonpayment, protest and notice of protest, and diligence in bringing suit against any party hereto, and sureties consent that the payment may be extended without notice thereof.

"First State Bank & Trust Company of Hammond, Louisiana,

"C. H. Houlton

"W. L. Houlton

"R. A. Kent,

"Liquidators.

"P. O. Address

"No. 5059

"Due June 23, 1933."

"Hammond, La.,

"June 23rd, 1926.

"To the Hammond State Bank,

"Hammond, La.

"In consideration of your loaning to the First State Bank & Trust Company the sum of One Hundred Ninety One Thousand Two Hundred, Fifty Eight and 71/100 ($ 191,258.71) Dollars, to be evidenced by its note dated this day, bearing six per cent per annum interest, payable monthly:

"Each of the undersigned, to-wit: Richard A. Kent, William L. Houlton and Charles H. Houlton do hereby unconditionally bind ourselves, in solido, to guarantee the payment of such note, less such amounts as you may credit thereon, before its maturity, from the liquidation of its assets.

"Respectfully submitted,

"C. H. Houlton

"R. A. Kent

"W. L. Houlton.

"Accepted:

"Hammond State Bank

"By: E. Richardson, Pres."

Upon the maturity of the note, which was reduced to the above balance, it was protested for nonpayment against the First National Bank & Trust Company, in liquidation, Charles H. Houlton, William L. Houlton, and the heirs of Richard A. Kent, who died after the execution of the guaranty but before the maturity of the note.

It will be observed that the guaranty executed by the individual defendants is absolute and unconditional. They bound themselves, in solido, to pay the note at its maturity, less such credits that might be applied to the note before maturity by the liquidators of the defunct debtor bank.

It has been held that a contract of guaranty in this state is equivalent to a contract of surety. Rev.Civ.Code, art. 3035; Gasquet v. Thorn, 14 La. 506; Graves v. Scott & Baer, 23 La.Ann. 690; Alter v. Zunts, 27 La.Ann. 317; Lachman & Jacobi v. Block & Bro., 47 La.Ann. 505, 17 So. 153, 28 L.R.A. 255.

Principals and guarantors or sureties who have bound themselves in solido, unconditionally, may be jointly sued in the...