Brock v. United States
| Docket Number | 16-3050 |
| Decision Date | 03 April 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
49 cases
-
Stewart v. United States
...(quoting Taylor , 495 U.S. at 601, 110 S.Ct. 2143 ).The circuits are divided on the question. See generally Brock-Miller v. United States , 887 F.3d 298, 306–07 (7th Cir. 2018) (surveying cases). The United States Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits apply the ......
-
Bridges v. United States
...resolving a guideline question during plea negotiations would, if proven, constitute deficient performance. In Brock-Miller v. United States , 887 F.3d 298, 309–10 (7th Cir. 2018), we remanded for a hearing on allegations of deficient performance. We rejected the government's argument that ......
-
Christopher v. United States
...plea, provided a blueprint for the "actual minor" challenge that the text of the statute arguably suggests. See Brock-Miller v. United States, 887 F.3d 298, 311 (7th Cir. 2018) ("Reading statutes and discerning their plain meaning is neither convoluted nor sophisticated; it is what lawyers ......
-
Neal v. United States
...question of whether the . . . categorical approach applies to the term 'felony drug offense' for the purpose of" Section 841 in Brock-Miller v. United States, where in April 2018, we reserved an answer "for another day." 887 F.3d 298, 307 (7th Cir. 2018). That day came four months later in ......
Get Started for Free