Brodnex v. Texas
| Docket Number | PD-1087-14 |
| Decision Date | 23 March 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
118 cases
-
Lall v. State
...detention. We disagree. In reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, we apply a bifurcated standard of review. Brodnex v. State , 485 S.W.3d 432, 436 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) ; Martinez v. State , 348 S.W.3d 919, 922–23 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). We give almost total deference to the trial cou......
-
State v. Martinez
...(Tex. Crim. App. 2011). In reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, we apply a bifurcated standard of review. Brodnex v. State , 485 S.W.3d 432, 436 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) ; Martinez , 348 S.W.3d at 922–23. We give almost total deference to the trial court's determination of the historic......
-
Wells v. State
...We review de novo mixed questions of law and fact that do not hinge on assessments of credibility or demeanor. Brodnex v. State , 485 S.W.3d 432, 436 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). "If the ruling of the trial court is correct under any applicable theory of law, we will sustain its ruling." Furr , ......
-
Monjaras v. State
...one that conceivably could be damning is the prior arrest, which is not a basis for reasonable suspicion. See Brodnex v. State , 485 S.W.3d 432, 437–38 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016) (defendant's reputed status as "known criminal" not enough).Finally, in Crain , the Court noted that when the office......
Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
-
Search and seizure: persons
...known for narcotics activity and combined with the officer’s unsubstantiated belief the suspect is a known criminal. Brodnex v. State, 485 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). Even though an investigatory detention may be unconstitutional, evidence seized as part of a search incident to ......
-
Search and Seizure: Persons
...activity and combined with 3-11 S S :P §3:32 the officer’s unsubstantiated belief the suspect is a known criminal. Brodnex v. State, 485 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Tex. Crim. App. just two days before and moved his hand toward his pocket during an investigative detention based on reasonable suspicion......
-
Search and Seizure: Persons
...known for narcotics activity and combined with the officer’s unsubstantiated belief the suspect is a known criminal. Brodnex v. State, 485 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). Even though an investigatory detention may be unconstitutional, evidence seized as part of a search incident to ......
-
Search and Seizure: Persons
...known for narcotics activity and combined with the officer’s unsubstantiated belief the suspect is a known criminal. Brodnex v. State, 485 S.W.3d 432, 438 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). Even though an investigatory detention may be unconstitutional, evidence seized as part of a search incident to ......
Get Started for Free