Brogdon v. Brogdon
| Docket Number | S11F1975 |
| Decision Date | 27 February 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
-
Park-Poaps v. Poaps
...that may, in a particular case, warrant a ‘specific deviation’ from the presumptive amount of child support." Brogdon v. Brogdon , 290 Ga. 618, 621 (5), 723 S.E.2d 421 (2012). See OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (2) (listing specific deviations). The guidelines also provide that "[d]eviations from the p......
-
Jackson v. Sanders
...earnings at trial.2 Thus, there was some reliable evidence of Jackson's income introduced at trial. Compare Brogdon v. Brogdon, 290 Ga. 618, 620(3), 723 S.E.2d 421 (2012) (where evidence showed wife had no regular employment, trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that it had n......
-
Spruell v. Spruell
...to make the required findings as to why deviation from presumptive amount of child support was appropriate); Brogdon v. Brogdon , 290 Ga. 618, 623 (5) (b), 723 S.E.2d 421 (2012) (explaining that [the statutorily required] written findings must be included in the final child support order if......
-
Black v. Black
...supports the deviation and whether the trial court abused its discretion with respect to that deviation. See Brogdon v. Brogdon, 290 Ga. 618, 625(5)(b), 723 S.E.2d 421 (2012). The express findings required under OCGA § 19–6–15(c)(2)(E) and (i)(1)(B) “are mandatory to ensure that the best in......
Get Started for Free