Brookfield v. Elmer Glass Works
Decision Date | 28 March 1906 |
Citation | 144 F. 418 |
Parties | BROOKFIELD et al. v. ELMER GLASS WORKS. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
Kenyon & Kenyon, for complainants.
Walter H. Bacon and Joseph C. Fraley, for defendant.
The complainants allege that the defendant infringes the Kribs patent, No. 542,565, dated July 9, 1895. In the introductory words to the specification of the patent it is declared that:
'The object of this invention is to provide a press by which the operation of forming insulators for telegraph lines and the like can be rapidly and accurately carried on; and the invention resides in the novel features of construction set forth in the following specifications and claims and illustrated in the annexed drawings.'
The specification contains a particular description of the drawings, and is followed by 10 claims. The only claims alleged to be infringed are the second and third, and they are as follows:
The patent was sustained as a valid one in Brookfield et al. v. Novelty Glass Manufacturing Company (C.C.) 124 F. 551. The defense in the present case is merely that of noninfringement. In the proofs, reference has been made by the defendant's witnesses to a number of patents antedating the patent in suit; but, in this suit, they can be used only for the purpose of ascertaining the prior art, and to aid in the construction that should be given to the claims of the patent in suit. Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. 37, at bottom of page 41, 23 L.Ed. 200; Grier v. Wilt, 120 U.S. 412, at page 429, 7 Sup.Ct.,at page 729, 30 L.Ed. 712.
The parts of the invention mentioned in the second claim of the patent are so combined that the mold, after a proper quantity of molten glass has been placed in it, is brought by the rotation of the movable support or turn-table on which it rests to a point directly under the actuating rod; then the actuating rod, which moves vertically up and down by means of a lever, to the lower end of which a screw plunger has been previously attached, is pressed down, thus forcing the plunger into the molten glass; then, on raising the lever, the plunger becomes detached from the actuating rod and remains in the molten glass; the mold, and its contents of molten glass and the plunger imbedded therein, are then carried to the rotary spindle by turning the movable support or turn-table on which the mold rests; the lower end of the rotary spindle is then attached to or engages with the upper end of stem of the plunger, so that, by turning the spindle, the plunger is unscrewed from the glass. The glass insulator thus formed has on its inner surface a spiral thread corresponding with the external spiral thread of the screw plunger.
That each of the elements in this combination is old appears by reference to the following patents. The movable support or turn-table and the glass molds carried thereon are shown in the Cook patent, No. 238,090, dated February 22, 1881, in which it is said (referring to the annexed drawing) that etc.; and in the Haley patent, No. 181,434, dated August 22, 1876, in which Haley says that etc.; and in the Johnson patent, No. 282,989, dated August 14, 1883, in which Johnson says that 'The turn-table, A, upon which the glass molds are located, is suitably mounted upon a table, B, of any desired construction,' etc.
An actuating rod provided with a screw plunger detachable therefrom is shown in the Brookfield patent, No. 113,393, dated April 4, 1871, where the patentee in his specification says:
An actuating rod provided with a detachable screw plunger is also shown in the Pennycuick patent, No. 324,157, dated August 11, 1855.
A rotary spindle adapted to engage the screw plunger so that the screw plunger may be unscrewed from the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wagner Typewriter Co. v. F.S. Webster Co.
... ... Justice Clifford in ... Aiken v. Manchester Print Works, 2 Cliff. 435 (Fed ... Cas. No. 113), where the invention was of a ... platinum sleeves, close the hole by fusing a piece of glass ... over it, and then exhaust the air. (C.C.) 58 F. 878, ... affirmed.' ... ...
-
Novelty Glass Mfg. Co. v. Brookfield
... ... requirement that its chief merit, if not its real claim, to ... invention consists ... But as ... is well said in Brookfield v. Elmer Glass Works ... (C.C.) 144 F. 418, 421, a suit on the same patent ... against another defendant, the novelty as well as the virtue ... of the ... ...
-
Brookfield v. Novelty Glass Mfg. Co.
... ... claims as valid combinations. When claims 2 and 3 of the same ... patent were before me, in Brookfield v. Elmer Glass Works ... (C.C.) 144 F. 418, I also held the elements of the ... combinations in those two claims to be old, as did the ... Circuit Court of ... ...
-
Brookfield v. Elmer Glass Works
...for appellee. Before DALLAS, GRAY, and BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judges. DALLAS, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decree in a patent suit (144 F. 418), which the appellants were the complainants, and the appellee was the defendant. The defendant was charged with infringement of patent No. ......