Brooks v. Francis

Decision Date15 March 1984
Docket NumberNo. 83-8028,83-8028
PartiesWilliam Anthony BROOKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert FRANCIS, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Mary Beth Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, J. Robert Elliot, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 15, 1983, 11th Cir., 1983, 716 F.2d 780).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Brooks v. Kemp
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 31, 1985
    ...declined to grant relief on any of these six issues. Brooks v. Francis, 716 F.2d 780 (11th Cir.1983), vacated for reh'g en banc, 728 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir.1984). With respect to each of these six issues, we reinstate Parts IV, VI, VII, VIII, X and XI of the panel Brooks was convicted of armed......
  • Tucker v. Kemp
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 31, 1985
    ...of counsel at the guilt/innocence phase of his trial. Tucker v. Francis, 723 F.2d 1504 (11th Cir.), vacated for reh'g en banc, 728 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir.1984). With respect to these issues, we reinstate the panel opinion. See Parts III and VI of the panel opinion and that portion of Part IV c......
  • Lesko v. Lehman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • March 11, 1991
    ...three times 'I didn't do it.' " 409 F.2d at 64.15 Compare Tucker v. Francis, 723 F.2d 1504 (11th Cir.), vacated for reh'g en banc, 728 F.2d 1358 (1984), reinstated in relevant part, 762 F.2d 1496 (1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 3340, 92 L.Ed.2d 743 (1986). The Tucke......
  • McCleskey v. Kemp
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • January 29, 1985
    ... ... Francis, 720 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir.1983), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2677, 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984), and Tucker v. Francis, 723 F.2d 1504 (11th ... See Jarrell v. Balkcom, 735 F.2d 1242, 1257 (11th Cir.1984); Brooks v. Francis, 716 F.2d 780, 793-94 (11th Cir.1983), on pet. for reh'g and for reh'g en banc, 728 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir.1984); Spencer v. Zant, 715 F.2d ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT