Brooks v. Minnesota
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | Brooks v. Minnesota, 133 S. Ct. 1996, 81 USLW 3276, 81 USLW 3595, 81 USLW 3598 (2013) |
| Decision Date | 22 April 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. 12–478.,12–478. |
| Parties | Wesley Eugene BROOKS, petitioner, v. MINNESOTA; and Wesley Eugene Brooks, petitioner, v. Minnesota. |
Case below, 2012 WL 1570064.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgments vacated, and cases remanded to the Court of Appeals of Minnesota for further consideration in light of Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 1552, –––L.Ed.2d –––– (2013).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
State v. Birk, A12-1892
...review of Brooks, but vacated the original judgments and remanded for further review following issuance of McNeely. Brooks v. Minnesota, 133 S. Ct. 1996 (2013). 3. Justice Stras concurred in the judgment, urging the supreme court to adopt a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. Bro......
- Brooks v. Minnesota
1 firm's commentaries
-
International Litigation Update: Developments Concerning the Alien Tort Statute and Personal Jurisdiction
...of a specific, universal, and obligatory norm of international law), vacated and remanded by, 2013 WL 1704704, 80 USLW 3335, 81 USLW 3028, 81 USLW 3595, 81 USLW 3598 (U.S. Apr 22, 2013) (NO. 11-649). iv Kiobel, 133 S. Ct. at 1664-65. v Id. at 1665. vi Id. vii Id. at 1665-66. viii Id. at 166......