Brooks v. Moss, Civ. A. No. 4360.
| Decision Date | 16 June 1965 |
| Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 4360. |
| Parties | William BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. Alva MOSS, Defendant. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina |
No appearance for defendant.
This is an action pursuant to Title 42, Section 1981 et seq., of the United States Code.
The plaintiff commenced the action by service of a complaint upon the defendant on June 18, 1963, alleging that on January 9, 1963 the plaintiff was driving his pick-up truck in the City of Whitmire, County of Newberry, State of South Carolina, when the defendant, who is a duly appointed Magistrate's Constable under the Laws of South Carolina, stopped the plaintiff's vehicle and assaulted the plaintiff, without just cause or excuse, and struck said plaintiff on the head with a blackjack, thereby inflicting grievous and painful injuries upon the plaintiff; that said defendant acting under the color of his official capacity, did wrongfully arrest the plaintiff on three charges of criminal violation which were wholly unfounded and perpetuated by the defendant to conceal the unlawful attack upon the plaintiff; that the plaintiff was tried on the alleged charges without a jury and acquitted on all three charges; that due to the unlawful arrest and detention under color of State Law, the plaintiff was deprived of his rights, privileges and immunities secured by the United States Constitution in violation of the aforesaid Section of the Civil Rights Act, all to his damage in the amount of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars.
Mr. Robert C. Lake, Jr., of Whitmire, South Carolina, notified counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Sol E. Abrams, of the Greenville South Carolina Bar, that he represented the defendant and an extension of time was granted by the Honorable J. Robert Martin, Jr., United States District Judge; however, no answer was ever filed and Mr. Lake petitioned this Court for withdrawal as counsel for the defendant. Said petition was granted and copies served upon the interested parties on March 30, 1965.
Pursuant to the statutory requirement, a notice of application for default judgment was served personally upon the defendant on March 20, 1965. The defendant made no response to the notice served upon him and was adjudged by the Court to be in default.
The matter was heard before this Court, without a jury. The plaintiff testified as to the assault upon him by defendant and the adverse effect it had upon him in that he sustained a scar on his forehead, was caused to lose time from his work, and his memory and mental function has been impaired; that the attack upon him was without just cause or excuse and that he was compelled to flee from the scene in order to avoid further abuse and injury.
Mr. William Yarborough was in the plaintiff's truck at the time of the attack upon the plaintiff and corroborated the plaintiff's testimony in reference to the unwarranted attack upon him.
The plaintiff's wife, Mary Brooks, also testified in the matter and related the plaintiff's condition immediately after the attack upon him and stated that plaintiff's memory has been definitely impaired.
Records containing the testimony of the three criminal...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green v. Cauthen
...F.2d 110, reh den., 319 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975, 84 S. Ct. 489, 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964); and Brooks v. Moss, 242 F.Supp. 531 (W.D. S.C.1965). B. Plaintiff can maintain an action under § 1983 for the failure of defendants to provide him medical attention while inca......
-
Hector v. Watt
...Schiller v. Strangis, 540 F.Supp. 605, 621 (D.Mass. 1982), Lykken v. Vavreck, 366 F.Supp. 585 (D.Minn. 1973), Brooks v. Moss, 242 F.Supp. 531 (W.D.S.C. 1965), and McArthur v. Pennington, 253 F .Supp. 420 (E.D.Tenn. 1963). We need not reconcile this caselaw, however, because the magistrate i......
-
Smith v. Losee
...($5,000 compensatory and $2,500 punitive damages for 30-45 minutes false imprisonment by county sheriff and deputy); Brooks v. Moss, 242 F.Supp. 531 (W.D.S.C.1965) ($3,500 actual damages and $500 punitive for arrest, detention, prosecution and physical attack by magistrate's constable); Ant......
-
Rogers v. Cofield
...motion in limine "insofar as it seeks to exclude Plaintiff's legal fees as an element of his alleged damages claim"); Brooks v. Moss, 242 F. Supp. 531 (W.D.S.C. 1965); McArthur v. Pennington, 253 F.Supp. 420, 430 (D.C.Tenn. 1963) (awarding $5,100 compensatory damages against police officers......