Brothers v. Bell Bakeries, 746
| Citation | 57 S.E.2d 317,231 N.C. 428 |
| Decision Date | 03 February 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 746,746 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
| Parties | BROTHERS, v. BELL BAKERIES Inc., et al. |
Royster & Royster, Oxford, for plaintiff.
Bickett & Banks, Raleigh, for defendants.
The ruling of the court below is in accord with the recent decision of this Court in the case of Dwiggins v. Parkway Bus Co., 230 N.C. 234, 52 S.E.2d 892, and the authorities cited therein.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.
...like jurisdiction. Cameron v. Cameron, 235 N.C. 82, 68 S.E.2d 796; Seawell v. Purvis, 232 N.C. 194, 59 S.E.2d 572; Brothers v. Bell Bakeries, Inc., 231 N.C. 428, 57 S.E.2d 317; Whitehurst v. Hinton, 230 N.C. 16, 51 S.E.2d 899; Taylor v. Schaub, 225 N.C. 134, 33 S.E.2d 658; Moore v. Moore, 2......
-
Cameron v. Cameron
...Johnson, 65 N.C. 478. It is immaterial that the parties, plaintiff and defendant, are reversed in the two actions. Brothers v. Bell Bakeries, Inc., 231 N.C. 428, 57 S.E.2d 317; Crouse v. York, 192 N.C. 824, 135 S.E. 451; Emry v. Chappell, 148 N.C. 327, 62 S.E. 411. The ordinary test for det......
-
Perry v. Owens, 459
...1 S.E.2d 834; Boney v. Parker, 227 N.C. 350, 42 S.E.2d 222; Dwiggins v. Parkway Bus Co., 230 N.C. 234, 52 S.E.2d 892; Brothers v. Bell Bakeries, 231 N.C. 428, 57 S.E.2d 317; Bullard v. Berry Coal & Oil Co., 254 N.C. 756, 119 S.E.2d 910. The defendant in such prior action would have a 'compl......
-
Demoret v. Lowery, 93
...and rights can be determined therein, such action will be dismissed.' Dwiggins v. Parkway Bus Co., supra; Brothers v. Bell Bakeries, Inc., 231 N.C. 428, 57 S.E.2d 317, citing many A plea in abatement is good if '(1) the plaintiff herein could obtain the same relief by counterclaim in said p......