Broussard v. Baker
Decision Date | 24 January 1916 |
Docket Number | No. 199,199 |
Citation | 241 U.S. 639,36 S.Ct. 285,60 L.Ed. 1215 |
Parties | J. J. BROUSSARD, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. R. BAKER, 1 Chief of Police of the City of Beaumont, Tex |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnp. Co. v. Norfolk & O. V. R. Co. 228 U. S. 596, 600, 57 L. ed. 982, 983, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609; Manhattan L. Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137, 58 L. ed. 1245, 1254, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 874; Easterling Lumber Co. v. Pierce, 235 U. S. 380, 382, 59 L. ed. 279, 281, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 133; (2) Fischer v. St. Louis, 194 U. S. 361, 48 L. ed. 1018, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 673; Davis v. Massa- chusetts, 167 U. S. 43, 42 L. ed. 71, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 731; (3) Iowa C. R. Co. v. Iowa, 160 U. S. 389, 40 L. ed. 467, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 344; Washington v. Miller, 235 U. S. 422, 429, 59 L. ed. 295, 299, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 119; Roby v. South Park Comrs. 238 U. S. 610, 59 L. ed. 1488, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 791.
Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
1 Death of N. N. Smith, and appointment of his successor, R. R. Baker, as chief of police of the city of Beaumont, Texas, suggested, and appearance of R. R. Baker, as the party defendant in error herein, filed and entered on November 29, 1915.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. York v. Board of Com'rs of Walla Walla County
...267, 128 P. 539; Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire R. Co., 79 Wash. 455, 140 P. 688, L.R.A.1917C, 225, appeal dismissed, 241 U.S. 639, 36 S.Ct. 285, 60 L.Ed. 1215; Lewis Seattle, 174 Wash. 219, 24 P.2d 427, 27 P.2d 1119. But whatever the nature of the interest may be, it is held in trust f......
-
City of San Antonio v. Robert Thompson & Co.
... ... 358, 49 L. Ed. 643, 3 Ann. Cas. 765; Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365, 47 S. Ct. 114, 71 L. Ed. 303, 54 A. L. R. 1016; Ex parte Broussard, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 333, 169 S. W. 660, L. R. A. 1918B, 1091, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 919; Id., 241 U. S. 639, 36 S. Ct. 285, 60 L. Ed. 1215; Zahn v. Board, 274 ... ...
-
Rainier Ave. Corp. v. City of Seattle
...Wash. 21, 69 P. 362 (1902); Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire R.R., 79 Wash. 455, 140 P. 688 (1914), appeal dismissed, 241 U.S. 639, 36 S.Ct. 285, 60 L.Ed. 1215 (1916); Johnston v. Medina Improvement Club, Inc., 10 Wash.2d 44, 116 P.2d 272 (1941); Finch v. Matthews, 74 Wash.Dec.2d 163, 443......
-
Prince v. W. H. Cothrum & Co.
...13, 215 S.W. 222; Ex parte Broussard, 74 Tex.Cr.R. 333, 169 S.W. 660, L.R.A.1918B, 1091, Ann.Cas.1917E, 919; Broussard v. Baker, 241 U.S. 639, 36 S.Ct. 285, 60 L.Ed. 1215. In our opinion, section 1 of the ordinance above set out is severable from section 2, and effectually amended the then ......
-
Table of Cases
...19.4(1), 19.4(2), 19.5(3), 19.5(7) Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire Realty. Co., 79 Wash. 455, 140 P. 688 (1914), error dismissed, 241 U.S. 639 (1916): 3.9(1) Bridle Trails Cmty. Club v. City of Bellevue, 45 Wn. App. 248, 724 P.2d 1110 (1986): 12.2(6)(c), 15.11(1) Broughton Lumber Co. v. ......
-
§ 3.9 - Estate Acquired
...the dedicators is a redundancy. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire Realty. Co., 79 Wash. 455, 458-59, 140 P. 688 (1914), error dismissed, 241 U.S. 639 It is uncertain how specific a dedication must be to convey a fee simple to the public. In King County v. Hanson Inv. Co., 34 Wn.2d 112, 208......