Brouzas v. City of Morgantown
Decision Date | 25 November 1958 |
Docket Number | No. 10944,10944 |
Citation | 144 W.Va. 1,106 S.E.2d 244 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | Christopher G. BROUZAS et al. v. The CITY MORGANTOWN, a Municipal Corporation, et al. |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. A proceeding to obrain a declaratory judgment as to the validity of a municipal ordinance is a collateral attack upon such ordinance.
2. The findings of the council as a municipality in connection with the adoption of an ordinance constitute the basis for the adoption of such ordinance; and such findings are legislative in character and the adoption of such ordinance involves the exercise of a legislative function.
3. In the absence of fraud, collusion or other wrongdoing upon the part of the council of a municipality in the adoption of an ordinance, the recitals of the facts which constitute the basis for its enactment are conclusive when the subject matter of the ordinance is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the council.
4. In a declaratory judgment proceeding the court will not inquire as to the truth or the falsity of the facts upon which action of a legislative body is based when it has sole jurisdiction of the subject.
5. By Section 8(a), Article 2, Chapter 126, Acts of the Legislature, 1933, Regular Session, the council of The City of Morgantown is vested with power to 'lay off, vacate, close, open, alter, curb pave, and keep in good repair, roads, streets, alleys, sidewalks, crosswalks, drains and gutters' within the city for the use of its inhabitants.
6. 'Where, from the record of a municipal corporation, it appears that the council found to exist the facts necessary to confer upon it the power to act in a particular case, such finding cannot be questioned collaterally.' Point 4, syllabus, City of Avis v. Allen, 83 W.Va. 789 [99 S.E. 188].
H. William Largent, Geo. R. Farmer, Morgantown, for appellant.
Clark B. Frame, Minter L. Wlson, John D. Downes, Morgantown, for appellees.
HAYMOND, President.
This is a declaratory judgment proceeding instituted in the Circuit Court of Monongalia County on July 5, 1956, against the defendants, The City of Morgantown, a municipal corporation, Edwin C. Arkwright and Agnes J. Arkwright, in which the plaintiffs Christopher G. Brouzas and Florence K. Brouzas challenge the validity of an ordinance adopted by the Common Council of The City of Morgantown on March 17, 1953, vacating and annulling a portion of a public city street known as Cox Place. The real estate owned by the plaintiffs, though abutting on Cox Place, does not abut on that portion of the street vacated by the ordinance but a part of the real estate owned by the defendants Edwin C. Arkwright and Agnes J. Arkwright abuts on that part of the street vacated by it.
The case was heard upon the petition of the plaintiffs, the separate demurrers of the defendants which were overruled, the separate answers of the defendants, the replications of the plaintiffs to the separate answers of the defendants, and the evidence introduced in behalf of the respective parties.
By final decree entered July 29, 1957, the court held that challenged ordinance to be null and void, overruled the motion of the defendants Edwin C. Arkwright and Agnes J. Arkwright to dismiss them from this proceeding, and awarded costs in favor of the plaintiffs against all the defendants. From that judgment this Court granted this appeal December 16, 1957, upon the application of the defendant The City of Morgantown, which will be referred to in this opinion as the defendant.
The challenged ordinance, adopted by the council March 17, 1953, by a vote of eight members for and five members against its adoption, was introduced in evidence by the plaintiffs and is expressed in these terms:
'AN ORDINANCE VACATING, ABANDONING AND ANNULLING THAT PART OF COX PLACE, FORMERLY CALLED MORGAN PLACE, NOT USED FOR STREET PURPOSES IN THE HOPECREST ADDITION OF THE FIRST WARD OF THE CITY OF MORGANTOWN, MONONGALIA COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.
'Whereas, it has been determined by the Common Council of The City of Morgantown that part of a turn- around area adjacent to Lot No. 68 in the Hopecrest Addition to the First Ward of the City of Morgantown, Monongalia County, West Virginia, is not needed for street purposes or for any other public use or public purpose and that it is proper that the same be vacated, abandoned and annulled;
'Now therefore be it ordained by the Common Council of The City of Morgantown in regular session assembled:
In 1925 the owners of the land comprised in Hopecrest Addition in the first ward of The City of Morgantown who appear to have been Wayne Cox and Thomas J. Wotring caused a map or plat of that addition, dated June 30, 1925 and showing the lots and streets and avenues within the addition, to be recorded in the office of the Clerk of the County Court of Monongalia County. By deed dated June 12, 1928, Wayne Cox and Sara D. Cox, his wife, who appear to have been the owners of the ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Board of Ed. of Wyoming County v. Board of Public Works
...23, involving the determination of the rights of conflicting claimants to collect certain accounts receivable; and Brouzas v. The City of Morgantown, W.Va., 106 S.E.2d 244, involving the validity of a municipal Section 1, Article 13, Chapter 55, Code, 1931, as amended, provides in part that......
-
State ex rel. Smith v. Boles
...ex rel. Cox v. Boles, 146 W.Va. 392, 120 S.E.2d 707; State ex rel. Favors v. Tucker, 143 W.Va. 130, 100 S.E.2d 411; Brouzas v. City of Morgantown, 144 W.Va. 1, 106 S.E.2d 244, which point up the inconsistent positions adopted by this Court with regard to collateral attacks upon a judgment a......
-
State ex rel. West Virginia Housing Development Fund v. Copenhaver
...S.E.2d 680, 683; State ex rel. Appalachian Power Co. v. Gainer, 149 W.Va. 740, 750, 143 S.E.2d 351, 359; Brouzas v. City of Morgantown, 144 W.Va. 1, 12--13, 106 S.E.2d 244, 250--251; La Follette v. City of Fairmont, 138 W.Va. 517, pt. 3 syl., 76 S.E.2d 572; 16 Am.Jur., Constitutional Law, S......
-
State ex rel. Ohio County Commission v. Samol
...County v. Demus, 148 W.Va. 398, 135 S.E.2d 352; LaFollette v. City of Fairmont, 138 W.Va. 517, 76 S.E.2d 572; Brouzas v. City of Morgantown, 144 W.Va. 1, 106 S.E.2d 244." (151 W.Va. at 354, 151 S.E.2d at In the present case, the record discloses that at a hearing before the Ohio County Comm......