Brown Media Corp. v. K & L Gates, LLP

Decision Date28 February 2018
Docket Number2:15–cv–00676 (ADS)(ARL)
Citation586 B.R. 508
Parties BROWN MEDIA CORPORATION and Roy E. Brown, Plaintiffs, v. K & L GATES, LLP and Edward M. Fox, Defendants.
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

Law Office of Daniel L. Abrams, PLLC, 31 Penn Plaza, 132 West 31st Street, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10001, Attorney for the Plaintiffs.

Silverman Acampora LLP By: Anthony A. Acampora, Esq., Of Counsel, 100 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 300, Jericho, NY 11753, Attorneys for the Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER

SPATT, District Judge:

On or about November 27, 2013, Brown Media Corporation ("Brown Media") and Roy E. Brown ("Roy") (together, the "Plaintiffs") commenced this action against K & L Gates, LLP ("KLG"), Edward M. Fox ("Fox", together with KLG the "Defendants") as well as a recently dismissed individual defendant, Eric T. Moser.

The claims in this action arise from a related bankruptcy proceeding. Therefore, the case was automatically referred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York (the "Bankruptcy Court").

On December 1, 2014, the Defendants filed a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) ; Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure (" FED. R. BANKR. P. ") 5011 ; and Local Bankruptcy Rule 5011–1, to withdraw the automatic reference and have the case proceed before this Court. On or about January 14, 2015, while that motion was pending, the Defendants filed a second motion, pursuant to FED. R. BANKR. P. 7012 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (" FED. R. CIV. P. " or "Rule") 12(b)(6), to dismiss the complaint.

On January 28, 2015, this Court withdrew the reference from the Bankruptcy Court.

On November 21, 2015, the Court granted the Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) on the grounds that res judicata bars the Plaintiffs' claims for breach of fiduciary duty, tortious interference and common law fraud ("2015 MTD Decision").

On April 14, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the Court's judgment issued pursuant to the 2015 MTD Decision, ruling "[b]ecause the plaintiffs' claims are not of the sort that should have been raised in the underlying bankruptcy proceedings nor do they implicate the validity of the asset sale confirmed in the bankruptcy proceedings, res judicata does not bar them." Docket Entry ("DE") 18 at 2.

On February 8, 2018, Eric T. Moser was voluntarily dismissed from this case.

Presently before the Court is the motion by the Defendants, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Plaintiffs' entire complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. As stated above, the previous decision that dismissed the complaint was vacated and remanded by the Second Circuit for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. For the following reasons, the Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Unless otherwise noted, the following salient facts are drawn from the complaint and are construed in favor of the Plaintiffs.

A. The Parties

Brown Media is a Delaware Corporation, which was established in March 2010 for the express purpose of acquiring the assets of an entity known as Brown Publishing Company and its affiliated entities (collectively "Brown Publishing").

Roy is an individual residing in Cincinnati, Ohio. He presently owns the substantial majority of the stock of Brown Media, and is the former CEO, shareholder, and director of Brown Publishing. Roy is also a part of Brown Publishing's management group.

The defendant, KLG, is an international law firm with approximately forty-five offices located throughout the United States and abroad. The individual defendant Fox and former defendant Moser are attorneys and former partners at KLG, both of whom currently reside in New York.

B. Pre–Bankruptcy

Brown Publishing was a closely-held corporation, which was controlled by Roy; his brother Clancy; his parents, Bud and Joyce; the company's former General Counsel, Joel Dempsey ("Dempsey"); and one Joel Ellingham ("Ellingham") (collectively, the "Managers"). Brown Publishing was a family business, having been founded in 1920 by Roy's grandfather.

At an unspecified time, Brown Publishing received financing from a company known as Windjammer Capital ("Windjammer"). In connection with their financing arrangement, Windjammer allegedly retained an equity option, so that, in the event the loan was not repaid, Windjammer could exercise its option and force the sale of Brown Publishing's assets to recoup its investment.

For reasons not set forth in the complaint, it is alleged that in late 2008, although not yet in default, the Managers feared that Windjammer might soon exercise its option, which would result in their losing control of Brown Publishing. As a result, the Managers sought legal advice as to how best to maintain control of the enterprise.

In this regard, on or about December 12, 2008, allegedly on behalf of himself and the other Managers, Dempsey contacted Fox and KLG. On that date, Dempsey allegedly supplied Fox and KLG with a document entitled the "Warrant Put Memo" (the "Memo"), which sets forth the issues about which the Managers required legal advice. It is unclear who prepared the Memo, but, as to its contents, the complaint alleges as follows:

The [ ] Memo ask[ed] KLG for advice related to, inter alia, the legal ramifications of a proposed transaction whereby the Managers create a new LLC and Managers Roy, Dempsey, and Ellingham acquire the assets of Brown Publishing through the new LLC. This proposed transaction was to take place outside of bankruptcy. Legal issues specifically identified in the [ ] Memo included what actions to take, if any, with regards [sic] to Windjammer Capital, possible successor liability related to the proposed transaction, what state would be an advantageous one for incorporation of the new LLC, the tax consequences to the Managers, shareholder disclosure requirements, if any, and other issues pertaining to Brown Publishing's lenders.

See Compl. ¶ 20.

It is alleged that the Memo did not contemplate a bankruptcy. In fact, as noted above, Brown Publishing allegedly was not in default of any loans at this time and the Managers were specifically seeking advice about how to retain equity control through a non-bankruptcy transaction.

Allegedly, in response to the Memo, KLG and the individual Defendants provided advice directly to Roy and Dempsey, and billed the Managers for the time spent providing these legal services. In particular, KLG allegedly advised the Managers on ways to reduce the possibility of so-called successor liability—i.e., the possibility that the new LLC would succeed to the debts and liabilities of Brown Publishing after acquiring its assets. In order to minimize this possibility, KLG allegedly advised Roy not to participate in any eventual transaction, and advised Dempsey to relinquish his shares in an entity known as Brown Media Holdings Company ("Media Holdings"), so that he could become the majority owner of the new LLC.

By March 2009, Brown Publishing was in imminent danger of defaulting on its loan agreement with Windjammer. See Compl. ¶ 26. Accordingly, the Managers allegedly took a series of actions to protect Brown Publishing's interests.

In or about March 2009, the Managers allegedly decided to enter into a non-bankruptcy transaction that was structured similarly to the one contemplated by the Defendants in the Memo. The complaint does not provide many supporting details concerning this transaction. From the complaint, the Court cannot determine the parties to the transaction or any of the relevant terms or conditions. However, it is alleged that, in proceeding with this transaction, the Managers followed advice provided by KLG, namely, Roy did not participate and Dempsey relinquished his shares in Media Holdings.

At or about the same time, in March 2009, Windjammer allegedly commenced a lawsuit in Ohio, seeking to invalidate this transaction. Again, the complaint does not provide many supporting details, including the identities of the parties to that action. Nor does it specify whether the action was commenced in state or federal court; or what legal theory Windjammer asserted. Nevertheless, an unidentified Ohio court allegedly approved the transaction and authorized it to move forward.

However, again for reasons not explained in the complaint, at some unspecified time, the Managers allegedly rescinded the March 2009 transaction and, on the advice of KLG, proceeded to bankruptcy.

In this regard, it is alleged that when "[t]he March 2009 transaction did not solve the problems associated with Brown Publishing's debt," Dempsey contacted Fox in early May 2009 for advice. See Compl.

¶ 26. From May 2009 to June 2009, KLG allegedly advised the Managers that a sale of Brown Publishing's assets in bankruptcy was their best strategy in order to retain control of the company.

Further, KLG apparently advised Roy and Dempsey, in their individual capacities, to attempt to purchase Brown Publishing's assets through a sale pursuant to Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 363 (" § 363"), which authorizes the bankruptcy court to conduct a sale of a bankruptcy debtor's assets outside of the ordinary course of business. The complaint alleges that KLG suggested that, if the Managers, acting through the new LLC, purchased Brown Publishing's assets in a sale pursuant to § 363, they "could eliminate successor liability and related tax concerns, and that Roy's family members could potentially join the purchase."

In June 2009, KLG allegedly notified Roy and Dempsey that the firm was interested in representing Brown Publishing in its bankruptcy proceeding. According to the complaint, KLG did not disclose any conflict of interest created by simultaneously (a) representing Brown Publishing in connection with its bankruptcy filing; and (b) advising the Managers in connection with their efforts...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Intertek Testing Servs., N.A. v. Frank Pennisi, Nicholas Pennisi, Wendy Asklund & Big Apple Testing, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 9 Marzo 2020
    ...to support a claim for tortious interference with business relations or prospective economic advantage. Brown Media Corp. v. K&L Gates, LLP , 586 B.R. 508, 529 (E.D.N.Y. 2018) ; Threeline Imports, Inc. v. Vernikov , No. 15 Civ. 02333, 2016 WL 11472749, at * 17 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 28, 2016) ; see......
  • Kelco Constr. v. Spray in Place Sols, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 18 Septiembre 2019
    ..."is 'necessarily [a] fact specific' inquiry, . . . which is typically unsuited for a motion to dismiss." Brown Media Corp. v. K&L Gates, LLP, 586 B.R. 508, 524 (E.D.N.Y. 2018) (brackets in original) (quoting Oddo Asset Mgmt. v. Barclays Bank PLC, 19 N.Y.3d 584, 593, 950 N.Y.S.2d 325, 973 N.......
  • Rumsey Land Co. v. Res. Land Holdings, LLC (In re Rumsey Land Co.), 18-1452
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 20 Diciembre 2019
    ...it for its bidding activities should a higher bid ultimately emerge and win an eventual asset auction." Brown Media Corp. v. K & L Gates, LLP , 586 B.R. 508, 518 (E.D.N.Y. 2018).3 As noted above, RLH acquired the property from PBT for $4.75 million after the auction.4 A Motion to Withdraw R......
  • Prepaid Ventures, Ltd. v. Compton
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 21 Diciembre 2022
    ...... action”); Chen v. JP Standard Constr. Corp., . . 11 . . 14-CV-1086 (MKB), 2016 WL 2909966, at *4 ...See. Kirch v. Liberty Media Corp. , 449 F.3d 388, 402 (2d. Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissal of ... means element”); Brown Media Corp. v. K & L. Gates, LLP , 586 B.R. 508, 531 (E.D.N.Y. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT