Brown v. O'Byrne

Decision Date20 June 1907
Citation45 So. 129,153 Ala. 621
PartiesBROWN v. O'BYRNE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Dec. 19, 1907.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; A. A. Coleman, Judge.

Action by W. A. Brown against T. W. O'Byrne. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The complaint is in the following language: "Plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of $200, for this: That heretofore, on, to wit, the 1st day of February, 1904 defendant signed an instrument in writing, which said instrument was also signed by plaintiff, in which said instrument it was agreed that the sum of $60 per month should be paid to the plaintiff for a certain two-story brick house in Pratt City, Ala., on First avenue, between Third and Fourth streets, as rent for said building, which was to be occupied by McDaniel & Bowers for a saloon from the 1st day of February, 1904, to the 31st day of December, 1904. And plaintiff avers that the rents for the months of November and December, 1904, to wit, $120, with interest, have never been paid, and that the same are now past due, and that there are no offsets or counterclaims against the same. [ Here follow the stipulation to pay attorney's fees, and allegations that $80 was a reasonable fee, and an allegation of waiver of exemption.] Count 2: Plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of $200 under and by virtue of the terms of a certain written instrument bearing date, to wit, February 1, 1904 whereby plaintiff leased to McDaniel & Bowers a certain two-story brick house in Pratt City, Ala., on First avenue between Third and Fourth streets, to be used and occupied by said McDaniel & Bowers as a saloon from the 1st day of February, 1904, to the 31st day of December. 1904, at a monthly rental of $60 per month. [ Here follows an averment of rent due same as in count 1; also an averment to pay attorney's fees and of a waiver of exemption.] And plaintiff avers that the payment of said rent and the performance of all other terms and conditions of said lease was guaranteed by the defendant T. W. O'Byrne, and that the said O'Byrne, by signing said lease or instrument in writing, did guarantee the payment of said rents." The third count was added by way of amendment, setting out the lease contract in so many words, with the other averments as contained in counts 1 and 2. The fourth count is the same as the third count, with the additional allegation that the defendant executed said agreement for a valuable consideration as a surety to the said McDaniel & Bowers. The fifth count is the same as the third, with the additional allegation that the defendant executed said contract as a surety for the said McDaniel & Bowers. The sixth count is the same as the third, with the additional averment that the defendant executed said contract by signing his name thereto and agreed to guarantee the performance of the covenants therein on the part of said McDaniel & Bowers. The seventh count is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • February 27, 2013
    ...last-named party, and parol testimony is not admissible to show that he intended to bind himself thereby,’ ” (quoting Brown v. O'Byrne, 153 Ala. 621, 45 So. 129, 129 (1907))); Blackmer v. Davis, 128 Mass. 538, 542 (Mass.1880) (holding that where a contract's body shows consideration between......
  • Reitsch v. McCarty
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • September 14, 1916
    ... ... Franklin Pub. Co. 24 Misc. 180, 52 N.Y.S. 704; ... Newman v. Blum, Tex. , 9 S.W. 178; AEtna Iron ... Works v. Owen, 62 Ill.App. 603; Brown v ... O'Byrne, 153 Ala. 621, 127 Am. St. Rep. 77, 45 So ... 129; Furculi v. Bittner, 60 Misc. 112, 125 N.Y.S ... 36; Southern School Book ... ...
  • Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • November 29, 2012
    ...said last-named party, and parol testimony is not admissible to show that he intended to bind himself thereby,'" (quoting Brown v. O'Byrne, 45 So. 129, 129 (Ala. 1907))); Blackmer v. Davis, 128 Mass. 538, 542 (Mass. 1880) (holding that where a contract's body shows consideration between two......
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Oswell
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 19, 1953
    ...and the signature of a party not named appears signed to the instrument, it is not the contract of the last named party. Brown v. O'Byrne, 153 Ala. 621, 45 So. 129. But when the body of the instrument does not purport to set out the names of the grantors, all the signers are to be considere......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT