Brown v. O'Byrne
Decision Date | 20 June 1907 |
Citation | 45 So. 129,153 Ala. 621 |
Parties | BROWN v. O'BYRNE. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Dec. 19, 1907.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; A. A. Coleman, Judge.
Action by W. A. Brown against T. W. O'Byrne. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The complaint is in the following language: The third count was added by way of amendment, setting out the lease contract in so many words, with the other averments as contained in counts 1 and 2. The fourth count is the same as the third count, with the additional allegation that the defendant executed said agreement for a valuable consideration as a surety to the said McDaniel & Bowers. The fifth count is the same as the third, with the additional allegation that the defendant executed said contract as a surety for the said McDaniel & Bowers. The sixth count is the same as the third, with the additional averment that the defendant executed said contract by signing his name thereto and agreed to guarantee the performance of the covenants therein on the part of said McDaniel & Bowers. The seventh count is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
...last-named party, and parol testimony is not admissible to show that he intended to bind himself thereby,’ ” (quoting Brown v. O'Byrne, 153 Ala. 621, 45 So. 129, 129 (1907))); Blackmer v. Davis, 128 Mass. 538, 542 (Mass.1880) (holding that where a contract's body shows consideration between......
-
Reitsch v. McCarty
... ... Franklin Pub. Co. 24 Misc. 180, 52 N.Y.S. 704; ... Newman v. Blum, Tex. , 9 S.W. 178; AEtna Iron ... Works v. Owen, 62 Ill.App. 603; Brown v ... O'Byrne, 153 Ala. 621, 127 Am. St. Rep. 77, 45 So ... 129; Furculi v. Bittner, 60 Misc. 112, 125 N.Y.S ... 36; Southern School Book ... ...
-
Brush v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
...said last-named party, and parol testimony is not admissible to show that he intended to bind himself thereby,'" (quoting Brown v. O'Byrne, 45 So. 129, 129 (Ala. 1907))); Blackmer v. Davis, 128 Mass. 538, 542 (Mass. 1880) (holding that where a contract's body shows consideration between two......
-
Sun Oil Co. v. Oswell
...and the signature of a party not named appears signed to the instrument, it is not the contract of the last named party. Brown v. O'Byrne, 153 Ala. 621, 45 So. 129. But when the body of the instrument does not purport to set out the names of the grantors, all the signers are to be considere......