Brown v. Cheney, 829

Decision Date21 May 1962
Docket NumberNo. 829,829
PartiesW. Jake BROWN et al. v. J. Orville CHENEY, Commissioner of Revenues, Arkansas
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

D. D. Panich, for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 17, 1963
    ... ... ' 'in any line of commerce in any section of the country.' We analyzed the test in detail in Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 82 S.Ct. 1502, 8 L.Ed.2d 510, and that analysis need not ... ...
  • United States v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 10, 1965
    ... ... Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 322 n. 38, 82 S.Ct. 1502, 8 L. Ed.2d 510 (1962). As we ... ...
  • Hanks v. California Company, Civ. A. No. 9795.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Louisiana
    • November 9, 1967
    ... ... Smith v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc., W.D.La. 1965, 243 F.Supp. 130, aff'd per curiam, 5 Cir. 1967, 376 ... ...
  • Wometco Services, Inc. v. Gaddy
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 11, 1981
    ...where juke boxes may lead to unwholesome conditions. Brown v. Cheney, 233 Ark. 920, 350 S.W.2d 184 (1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 796, 82 S.Ct. 1156, 8 L.Ed.2d 285 (1962). The Supreme Court of the United States has approved regulation of a privilege where there is a legitimate state interest. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT