Brown v. Chi., M. & St. P. R. Co.

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
CitationBrown v. Chi., M. & St. P. R. Co., 80 Wis. 162, 49 N.W. 807 (Wis. 1891)
Decision Date29 September 1891
PartiesBROWN v. CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. R. CO.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Richland county; GEORGE CLEMENTSON, Judge.

Action by Hattie Brown, administratrix of Clark E. Brown, against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Company for negligently causing the death of deceased, who was a passenger on one of its freight trains. Order granting a nonsuit, from which order plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate, Clark E. Brown, on the 15th day of October, 1887, which death plaintiff claims resulted from the negligent management of defendant's freight train on which said Brown was a passenger. Brown desired to stop at a station called “Blue River,” and the complaint charges that the defendant's employes negligently failed to cause the train to stop at Blue River long enough for him to alight, and that they negligently caused the train to be jerked in such a way as to cause him, without negligence on his part, to be thrown from the car and injured, from the effects of which injuries he died. The defendant pleads contributory negligence. The evidence showed that the deceased boarded the train at Boscobel, and desired to get off at Blue River; that he rode in the caboose with several other passengers; that he had two bundles, and sat down in a corner of the car with his hat pulled down over his eyes, as if dozing or thinking; that the train passed through Blue River station without stopping, one of the witnesses testifying that there was no change of speed, except that speed was increased when the station was passed to nearly or quite 18 miles an hour; that the deceased arose from his seat as the train was passing Blue River station, picked up his packages, looked out of the window, and went out of the back door of the caboose; that another passenger followed him to the door “shortly afterwards,” or “almost immediately,” and found that he was gone; that it was a little after 6 o'clock P. M. when the train left Boscobel, and was dark as it passed through Blue River; that the train was going east; and that the conductor had been through the car collecting fares. Upon the following morning the deceased was found by section hands in an unconscious condition, lying on a farm crossing, about a quarter of a mile east of Blue River, his body lying parallel with and about 3 feet from the track, with his head to the east. He remained unconscious until his death, which took place on the same day, and undoubtedly resulted from his injuries. About 8 feet west of the crossing 2 foot marks or tracks were found in the sand, close together, parallel with the rail, and 2 1/2 or 3 feet distant therefrom, sunk 2 or 3 inches into the sand, and pointing eastward. The bundles of the deceased were found 45 to 48 feet west of the body on the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Hart v. W. Side R. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1893
    ...he cannot recover damages therefor against the railway company. Jewell v. Railroad Co., 54 Wis. 610, 12 N. W. 83;Brown v. Railway Co., 80 Wis. 162, 49 N. W. 807. It follows from what has been said that, if the plaintiff is to be regarded as a passenger upon the car, then the fact that he wa......
  • Shevlin v. Am. Mut. Acc. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1896
    ...stopped, yet not for a reasonable length of time to allow him to alight. Jewell v. Railway Co., 54 Wis. 610, 12 N. W. 83;Brown v. Railway Co., 80 Wis. 162, 49 N. W. 807. Such an act is prima facie evidence of negligence. Railway Co. v. Bangs, 47 Mich. 470, 11 N. W. 276;Cousins v. Railway Co......
  • Walters v. Chi. & N. W. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • February 18, 1902
    ...unnecessarily steps from a train which he knows to be in motion is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Brown v. Railway Co., 80 Wis. 162, 49 N. W. 807. But in the present case the plaintiff testifies that he did not know the train was moving when he stepped off. While such......