Brown v. City of Atchison
Decision Date | 10 March 1888 |
Citation | 17 P. 465,39 Kan. 37 |
Parties | J. P. BROWN, et al., v. THE CITY OF ATCHISON |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Error from Atchison District Court.
THIS was an action brought in the district court of Atchison county on March 26, 1883, by the city of Atchison against William Hetherington and Webster W. Hetherington, partners as Wm. Hetherington & Co., to have certain bonds of the city of Atchison, twenty in number and each for $ 500, amounting in the aggregate to $ 10,000, canceled and declared null and void for illegality in their execution, and for want of consideration. On December 12, 1883, the defendants answered setting forth the circumstances under which the bonds were placed in their hands, that they had no interest in the bonds except as trustees, that J. P. Brown and Frank Bier, partners as Brown & Bier, were the real owners of the bonds, and that there could not be a complete determination of the questions involved in the controversy without Brown & Bier being made parties, and asking that they should be so made parties. Also, Brown & Bier appeared and asked to be made parties defendant, which was granted; and on January 8 1884, they filed their answer and cross-petition, setting forth in substance among other things, the following: On August 23, 1879, Brown & Bier owned bonds of the city of Atchison amounting to $ 49,943.95, which by way of compromise they permitted to be re-funded by the city of Atchison at the rate of sixty cents on the dollar. At the same time and as a part of the same transaction, they, with the city of Atchison, entered into a certain contract in pursuance of which the bonds in controversy were issued and placed in the hands of Wm. Hetherington & Co., as trustees, and it is alleged that the city of Atchison has violated such contract in various particulars, whereby it has become liable to Brown & Bier; and therefore they prayed that judgment may be rendered against the city of Atchison, first, that its petition against Wm. Hetherington & Co. be dismissed; second, that the city of Atchison be decreed to specifically perform the aforesaid contract, and to issue further bonds to Brown & Bier to the amount of $ 19,977.58, with 7 per cent. interest from July 1, 1879, or that judgment be rendered in favor of Brown & Bier and against the city of Atchison for that amount; third, or if such judgment cannot be rendered, then that judgment be rendered in favor of Brown & Bier and against the city of Atchison for the sum of $ 70,000, or that the city return to Brown & Bier the original bonds and coupons delivered by them to the city in the same condition in which they were when delivered; and for other relief. Full replies were filed by the plaintiff to the answers of the defendants. The case was afterward tried before the court without a jury. And the court made special findings and conclusions of fact and law, and on May 29, 1886, rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants that the bonds in controversy be delivered up and canceled and held for naught, and that Brown & Bier be forever enjoined from setting up or claiming any right or interest therein or thereto. To reverse this judgment, Brown & Bier, as plaintiffs in error, bring the case to this court, making The City of Atchison the defendant in error.
The contract between the city of Atchison and Brown & Bier, as shown by the pleadings and the findings of the court, reads as follows:
Per JOHN C. TOMLINSON, Mayor.
BROWN & BIER."
Each of the bonds deposited with Wm. Hetherington & Co., except as to number, and each of the re-funding bonds, except as to number and amount, as is shown by the pleadings and the findings of the court, reads as follows:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
$ 500.
STATE OF KANSAS.
[State Seal.]
COUNTY OF ATCHISON.
CITY OF ATCHISON.--RE-FUNDING BOND.
Know all men by these presents, that the city of Atchison, (a city of the second class,) in the county of Atchison and state of Kansas, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the bearer, on July 1st, 1898, at the office of the treasurer of said city, the sum of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Donovan v. Kansas City
... ... Douglas County ... Commissioners, 107 U.S. 348, 27 L.Ed. 378; Floyd ... County v. Allen, 126 S.W. 124, 27 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1125; ... Brown v. Atchison, 39 Kan. 37, 17 P. 465, 27 L.R.A ... (N.S.) 1123; Edwards House Co. v. City of Jackson, ... 138 Miss. 644, 42 A.L.R. 625; Hill ... ...
-
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co.
...relief on this item. (Kitchen v. St. Louis, K. C. & N. R. Co., 69 Mo. 224; Clark v. Saline County, 9 Neb. 516; Brown v. City of Atchison, 39 Kan. 37; Sheldon v. Eickmeyer 90 N.Y. 616; Taylor v. South & N. A. R. Co., 4 Woods [U. S. C. C.], 575; Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. Marbury, 91 U.S. 592; Alle......
-
Deer Creek Highway District v. Doumecq Highway District
... ... organized under the same law and having the same powers. ( ... City of Colorado Springs v. Colorado City, 42 Colo ... 75, 94 P. 316; Boise Development Co. v. Boise ... 230, ... 2 N.E. 263; Hitchcock v. City of Galveston, 96 U.S ... 341, 24 L.Ed. 659; Brown v. City of Atchison, 39 ... Kan. 37, 7 Am. St. 515, 17 P. 465; Portland v. Bituminous ... Paving ... ...
-
Independent School District No. 5 ex rel. Moore v. Collins
... ... 138, 9 L.Ed. 374; Village of Pillager v. Hewett, 98 ... Minn. 265, 107 N.W. 815; Farmer v. City of St. Paul, ... 65 Minn. 176, 67 N.W. 991, 33 L. R. A. 199; Brown v. City ... of Atchison, 39 ... ...