Brown v. Corr. Reception Ctr.
Decision Date | 27 February 2020 |
Docket Number | No. 19AP-104,19AP-104 |
Citation | 146 N.E.3d 621,2020 Ohio 684 |
Parties | Alicia BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORRECTIONAL RECEPTION CENTER, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
On brief: Kemp, Schaeffer & Rowe, Co., LPA, and Erica A. Probst, Columbus, for appellant. Argued: Erica A. Probst.
On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, Eric A. Walker and Timothy M. Miller, Columbus, for appellee. Argued: Timothy M. Miller.
DECISION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Alicia Brown, appeals from a decision of the Court of Claims of Ohio entered on February 4, 2019 granting summary judgment against her and in favor of defendant-appellee, the Correctional Reception Center ("CRC"), on her claims for racial employment discrimination and retaliation. Her appeal is limited, however, to her claim for retaliation.1 Because, on de novo review, we find there are genuine issues of fact as to each of the disputed elements of Brown's claim for retaliation, we reverse the granting of summary judgment against her on that claim and remand for further proceedings.
{¶ 2} Brown began this case by filing a complaint against CRC for racial discrimination and retaliation after she confronted her boss with charges of racism on January 26, 2017, which allegedly caused him to immediately fire her. (Jan. 3, 2018 Compl. at ¶ 13, 16.) CRC answered, admitting that a confrontation took place in which Brown accused her boss, Anthony Ayers, of racism, but CRC denied that she was fired. (Jan. 30, 2018 Answer at ¶ 16-17.)
{¶ 3} After the parties conducted discovery, including ten depositions which were filed in the trial court and are part of the record,2 CRC moved for summary judgment on both of Brown's claims. (Nov. 5, 2018 Mot. for Summ. Jgmt.) CRC argued that Brown was never an employee of CRC, but rather, was an employee of a staffing agency, Around the Clock Healthcare ("ATC"), which placed her at CRC as an independent contractor. Id. at 4-8. CRC also argued that while Brown left employment after the disagreement with Ayers, Ayers did not actually take steps to fire her and she was not terminated by CRC. Id. at 10-11. Alternatively, CRC argued that Brown could not point to a similarly situated person not of the protected class who received better treatment or who replaced Brown. Id. at 11-13. Finally, CRC argued that Brown had not engaged in protected conduct for which CRC could have retaliated. Id. at 13-15. In addition to the depositions already on file with the trial court, CRC attached affidavits of two of Brown's superiors, Raphael Lilly and Ayers, as well as interrogatory answers from Brown. (Lilly Aff., attached to Nov. 5, 2018 Mot. for Summ. Jgmt.; Ayers Aff., attached to Nov. 5, 2018 Mot. for Summ. Jgmt.; Mar. 21, 2018 Interrogs., attached to Nov. 5, 2018 Mot. for Summ. Jgmt.)
{¶ 4} In her deposition, Brown testified that she worked as a health information technician ("HIT") at CRC under an arrangement with a staffing company, ATC. (May 10, 2018 Brown Dep. at 24, 28-33.) Her supervisors were Anthony Ayers (white), Robert Swackhammer (white), and Raphael Lilly (black). Id. at 51-52. Her last day at CRC was the day of her disagreement with Ayers, January 26, 2017. Id. at 58.
{¶ 5} On that day, Ayers informed her and a nurse, Kristina Gerber, that someone had reported witnessing them using foul language and that he wanted them to cease such unprofessional behavior. Id. at 102-04, 107-09, 110-11. After Gerber excused herself from Ayers' office, Brown testified that she accused Ayers of harassing her, of racism, and of attempting to rid the workplace of black persons. Id. According to Brown, Ayers responded by telling her to "get out" or he would "have [her] escorted out of here." Id. at 110-11. Brown left the facility at that point before her shift was concluded. Id. at 58. She testified that, as she collected her things, she spoke to Swackhammer, telling him that she felt this was wrong. Id. at 111.
{¶ 6} Brown explained that her allegations regarding Ayers were based on a lengthy period of interactions with Ayers in which he appeared to excessively criticize her job performance relative to her coworkers. Id. at 128-29. She opined that this began after she took Lilly's side in a conflict between Lilly and Ayers that involved an internal investigation. Id. at 72, 77-79, 116-17. She observed that Ayers seemed to be generally more critical of black workers than white workers. Id. at 105. Ayers once remarked to her that he did not understand why Lilly who was "stupid" and "black" had been promoted. Id. She testified that Ayers and Swackhammer treated two white HITs better than they treated her, but also elaborated that those two enjoyed a rapport with Ayers and Swackhammer because they all went to bars after work together. Id. at 126-27. Brown denied indicating to anyone that she had been planning to leave the job voluntarily anyway. Id. at 112. However, she did admit to having written an e-mail to her recruiter at ATC regarding the incident. Id. at 30-31, 62-63. That e-mail (which was also made an exhibit to Wolf's deposition) reads as follows:
(Sic passim.)
{¶ 7} Ayers agreed that he was one of Brown's supervisors in the sense that, as he and Swackhammer were healthcare administrators at CRC, they had supervisory authority over Lilly who, as the assistant healthcare administrator, had supervisory authority over all HITs. (July 18, 2018 Ayers Dep. at 6-10.) Yet, Ayers testified that he did not fire Brown and, in fact, had never fired a HIT. Id. at 15. He explained that to fire someone he would have had to have involved the deputy warden. Id. at 29-30. He admitted, however, that he wrote an incident report about Brown regarding a disagreement between them. Id. at 16-18. According to Ayers, he received a complaint from an unnamed "advanced level provider" that Brown and Gerber were yelling, cursing, and being unprofessional. Id. at 62-63. After confirming the report with the other "advanced level providers" in the area, he went to talk to Gerber and Brown and invited them to his office. Id. Gerber promised to clean up her language, but Brown denied using inappropriate language and asked to talk to him privately. Id. at 63. Gerber left. Id. After Gerber stepped out, Brown began to accuse Ayers of harassing her and nit-picking her work, she called him a racist, and accused him of trying to get rid of all the black employees. Id. at 16-18, 64-65. She continued yelling these accusations as she left the room and began to pack up. Id. at 16-18, 65-66. Ayers stated that the reason he completed an incident report was because Brown was yelling these allegations as she left his office in...
To continue reading
Request your trial