Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Docket Number15-11455
Decision Date21 March 2016

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
158 cases
  • United States v. Jackson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • December 13, 2022
    ...and Section 893.13(1) encompass the same universe of substances. But "assumptions are not holdings." Brown v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc. , 817 F.3d 1225, 1239 (11th Cir. 2016) ; see also Brecht v. Abrahamson , 507 U.S. 619, 631, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) ("[S]ince we have nev......
  • State ex rel. Surnaik Holdings of WV, LLC v. Bedell
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 20, 2020
    ...requirement was set forth by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's decision in Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc. , 817 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2016). In Brown ,the Eleventh Circuit provided a three-step approach for evaluating predominance: (1) identify the partie......
  • In re FCA US LLC Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • November 15, 2017
    ...Cir. 2015) (quoting Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. , 534 F.3d 1017, 1022 (9th Cir. 2008) ); see also Brown v. Electrolux Home Prod., Inc. , 817 F.3d 1225, 1231 (11th Cir. 2016) ("The claims under the Magnuson–Moss Act are identical to the other warranty claims noted because they are also ......
  • Graham v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • May 18, 2017
    ...effect in subsequent individual damages actions." Douglas , 110 So.3d at 429 (collecting cases); see also Brown v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc. , 817 F.3d 1225, 1239 (11th Cir. 2016) (discussing several "tools to decide individual damages" in a class action, including "(1) bifurcating liabi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • A Look at Potential Supreme Court Nominees’ Class Action Decisions
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • February 1, 2017
    ...prior post.) If Judge Hardiman is indeed elevated to the Supreme Court, the future of ascertainability may be brighter. Andrew Samuels Brown v. Electrolux (11th Cir. Writing for a unanimous Eleventh Circuit, Judge Pryor recently vacated a district court order certifying two statewide classe......
3 books & journal articles