Brown v. Jones
Decision Date | 06 June 2017 |
Docket Number | CASE NO. 1D16–4480 |
Citation | 229 So.3d 397 (Mem) |
Parties | Nathaniel BROWN, Appellant, v. Julie L. JONES, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nathaniel Brown, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Nathaniel Brown appeals the final order denying his petition for writ of mandamus, entered on September 9, 2016 by the circuit court in Brown v. Florida Department of Corrections, Case No. 2016 CA 000708 (2d Cir., Leon Cnty.). Because Mr. Brown fails to demonstrate that the circuit court abused its discretion in denying the extraordinary relief, the order is affirmed. Rosado v. State, 1 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (); see also Topps v. State, 865 So.2d 1253, 1257 (Fla. 2004) ().
We note that based on his numerous, repetitive appeals to this court from the trial court's denials of postconviction relief after his judgment and sentence were affirmed, Mr. Brown was sanctioned by this court in Brown v. State, 35 So.3d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Mr. Brown was prohibited from filing "any future appeals, petitions, motions, pleadings, or filings" challenging his judgment and sentence in case number 2005 CF 001831 (4th Cir., Duval Cnty.), unless such filings were signed by a member of the Florida Bar.
Subsequently, Mr. Brown embarked on a course of filing civil actions for extraordinary writs, directed towards the Florida Department of Corrections and the State of Florida. None of his appeals of the denials of these complaints and petitions were successful in this court. In Brown v. State, 186 So.3d 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), this court denied Mr. Brown's petition for writ of prohibition on the merits and warned him that future frivolous or successive filings in the court "may result in the imposition of sanctions against him," including additional limitations on his ability to file pro se appeals and petitions in this court.
In light of Appellant's active litigation record in this and the circuit courts of this state, and of this court's existing sanctions against and warning to Mr. Brown, in addition to affirming the order...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Villa Bellini Ristorante & Lounge, Inc. v. Mancini
...it on the merits, as it did here, then we would ordinarily review the ruling for an abuse of discretion. See Brown v. Jones, 229 So. 3d 397, 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (citing Rosado v. State, 1 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) ); Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs Broward Cty. Fla. v. Parrish, 154 So. ......
-
Brown v. Bondi, 1D17–1211
...filed myriad actions in this Court and others attacking his 2005 judgment and sentence entered in Duval County. See Brown v. State , 229 So.3d 397 (Mem.) (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). This appeal is the latest in that collection, and like the rest, it is frivolous.In 2010, we barred Appellant from "......