Brown v. Louisiana Dept. of Highways
Decision Date | 05 July 1979 |
Docket Number | No. 6961,6961 |
Parties | Kenny R. BROWN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS et al., Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
David K. Balfour, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.
Broussard, Bolton & Halcomb by Daniel E. Broussard, Jr., Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.
Before FORET, CUTRER and SWIFT, JJ.
This is a suit for damages arising out of a two car accident allegedly caused by a low shoulder of a state-maintained highway which had not been brought up to grade after the road surface was overlaid with one and one-half inches of asphalt. It was consolidated for trial and appeal with our No. 6960 entitled "Eugene A. Wilson, Jr., et al v. Louisiana Department of Highways", La.App., 373 So.2d 610. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in both suits, the defendant, State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (formerly the Department of Highways), has appealed. We affirm and render separate decrees.
The plaintiffs in the present suit, Kenny R. Brown, Henderson Anderson, Toney Martin and Frank Jackson, III, were passengers in a vehicle being driven by Eugene A. Wilson, Jr. and owned by Rosa Lee Wilson. The latter two persons filed the other action. The second vehicle was driven by Mrs. Annie Mouton, but she is not a party to this litigation.
We quote with approval from his reasons for judgment the trial judge's recital of the relatively undisputed facts:
The trial judge also found in regard to these disputed issues that at the time of the accident the shoulder was more than two inches lower than the asphalt surface; that this was a hazardous condition; that the Department was negligent in failing to eliminate the drop-off; and that it was a proximate cause of the accident for which the Department was legally responsible.
The legal responsibility of the Department as to highway accidents was generally stated by this court in LaBorde v. Louisiana Department of Highways, 300 So.2d 579 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974), writ denied, 303 So.2d 182 (La.1974) as follows:
Also see U. S. F. & G. Co. v. State, Dept. of Highways, 339 So.2d 780 (La.1976) and Guin v. State Through Dept. of Highways, 360 So.2d 1185 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1978).
Included within the Department's duties is the maintenance of the shoulders of the highway in a reasonably safe condition. Rue v. State, Department of Highways, 372 So.2d 1197 (La.1979). Specifically, where a drop-off to a low shoulder results from asphalt overlaid on the road by the Department or its contractor the former has the duty to repair the defect or hazardous condition within a reasonable length of time. Brandon v. State, Through Dept. of Highways, 367 So.2d 137 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1979). In this connection the court said:
"What constitutes a reasonable time to complete construction and to eliminate construction defects depends upon the circumstances of each case and involves consideration of factors such as the extent of the project, emergencies, availability of materials and manpower, priorities of projects, safety and economic aspects of construction, the nature and degree of the hazard created, the ability to adequately warn, and other factors."
In the cases now before this court the Department has admitted it had actual knowledge of the condition of the shoulder at the scene when the overlay was accepted from the contractor slightly over two months before the accident occurred. Consequently, the issues presented on this appeal are: (1) Whether the drop-off was patently or obviously dangerous to a reasonably careful and ordinarily prudent driver? (2) Whether a reasonable time had expired for the Department to eliminate the defect? (3) Whether the condition was a cause-in-fact of the accident?
(1) The defect.
No one actually measured the difference in the elevations of the road surface and its west shoulder. It was estimated by the state trooper who investigated the accident and two of the plaintiffs to be greater than two inches. However, all of them admitted it could be less. In view of such testimony and the stipulation of the parties, we cannot say the trial judge's determination that the drop-off exceeded two inches was manifestly in error.
The Department's "Maintenance Superintendent's Manual" states at Standard M4-12, "Raising shoulders must be done after any overlay". Also M4-2 it says that edge rut repairs "may be done on an inclement weather schedule . . . let them get at least one inch deep before repairs, and catch them before they get about two inches deep".
Professor Joseph H. Barnwell, an engineer who was recognized by the trial judge as an expert in the field of accident reconstruction, testified that the elevation difference in this case was a hazardous condition which tended to cause a vehicle to turn to the right when its right wheel ran onto the shoulder. This would have a detrimental effect on the driver's ability to maintain control of the car, particularly in this instance where the vehicle's right rear tire had blown out.
Mr. Lacy Glascock, a Bituminous Research Engineer with the Department who was qualified as an expert in traffic engineering, said that a one and one-half inch difference in elevation between the surface and shoulder of the highway was "in the area of what I would call a hazardous situation", but not an undue hazardous condition that would demand any action...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sparacello v. Andrews
...(1st Cir., 1978) Laird v. Travelers Insurance Company 263 La. 199, 267 So.2d 714 (1972) Brown v. Louisiana Department of Highways 373 So.2d 605 (3rd Cir., 1979) LeJeune v. Allstate Insurance Company 365 So.2d 471 (La.1978) DEFENDANTS' REQUESTED JURY CHARGES NO. 2 In determining whether or n......
-
Palmer v. State
... ... William M. PALMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, ... STATE of Louisiana et al, Defendant-Appellant ... Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third ... , we agree with the trial court that the Louisiana Department of Highways was negligent for allowing the sign to be placed on the highway ... American Beverage Company, 242 La. 471, 137 So.2d 298 (1962); Brown v. Louisiana Department of Highways, 373 So.2d 605 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1979), ... ...
-
Sibley v. Menard
... ... Randy MENARD et al ... No. 13808 ... Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit ... Dec. 15, 1980 ... Writ Denied May 1, 1981 ... John W. King and Wm. T. Doran, Baton Rouge, for Dept. of Transp. and Development ... Before COVINGTON, ... Highways, 372 So.2d 1197 (La.1979). Rue involved a one-car collision. The ... In the recent case of Brown v. Louisiana Department of Highways, 373 So.2d 605, 606 (La.App. 3 Cir ... ...
-
Maxwell v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 13635
... ... 19 A.L.R.4th 525 ... Sandra Duren Maxwell, wife of/and James F. MAXWELL ... STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ... AND DEVELOPMENT ... No. 13635 ... Court of Appeal ... of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development (Department of Highways) for damages and for injuries the wife sustained as a result of a one-car accident ... Sinitiere v. Lavergne, 381 So.2d 522 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1980); Brown v. Louisiana Department of Highways, 373 So.2d 605 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1979); Robertson v. Handy, 354 ... ...