Brown v. Marion Nat Bank of Lebanon
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | Brown v. Marion Nat Bank of Lebanon, 146 U.S. 619, 13 S.Ct. 260, 36 L.Ed. 1106 (1892) |
| Decision Date | 19 December 1892 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,123,1,123 |
| Parties | BROWN v. MARION NAT. BANK OF LEBANON |
T. L. Burnett and H. M. Lane, (Rives & Spalding, on the brief,) for plaintiff in error.
W. J. Lisle, for defendant in error.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE.
The writ of error is dismissed, upon the authority of Meagher v. Manufacturing Co., 145 U. S. 608, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 876; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 664; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U. S. 199, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 669.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Union Mut Life Ins Co v. Kirchoff
...not final. Especially is this the case when the opinion to which the new decree is required to conform does not appear. Brown v. Baxter, 146 U. S. 619, 13 Sup. Ct. 260; Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. 433; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 1 Sup. Ct. 15; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U. S. 199, 6 Su......
-
MacLeod v. Graven
... ... 318; Werner v ... Charleston, 151 U.S. 360, 14 Sup.Ct. 356; Brown v ... Baxter, 146 U.S. 619, 13 Aup.Ct. 260; Meagher v ... ...
-
Hume v. Bowie
...the writ is not a final judgment. Baker v. White, 92 U. S. 176; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 197, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 664; Brown v. Baxter, 146 U. S. 619, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 260. The question involved is one of power; for, if the court had power to make the order when it was made, then it was not a......
