Brown v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company

Decision Date07 November 1904
PartiesMYRTLE BROWN, Respondent, v. PACIFIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court.--Hon. Henry M. Ramey, Judge.

REVERSED.

STATEMENT.

This action was brought by plaintiff against defendant on an accident policy of insurance. The facts upon which it is founded may be summarized in about this way. Plaintiff is the widow of Seldon F. Brown, who, on April 20, 1902, was a machinist in the employ of the K. C., St. J. & C. B. Railroad Company in its shops at St. Joseph, Missouri, earning wages at $ 70 per month. On that day he applied to defendant company for insurance of a kind especially provided for persons employed in industrial pursuits, who, having no present means of payment of the premiums, are wage earners and which contemplates the payment of the premiums out of wages to be earned in the future. The employment of such persons being often only temporary and there being no basis for extending them credit, certain safeguards are provided to the company, as will be hereafter observed, against default in the payments of the premiums. The material portions of Brown's application are as follows:

"8. I am employed by K. C., St. J. & C. B. 9. My monthly wages are $ 70. 10. My class of risk under my occupation is agreed to be medium. 11. The amount of insurance against accidental death hereby applied for is $ 1,500. 12. The amount of weekly indemnity for totally disabling injuries not to exceed $ 7.50. 13. The premium to be paid by four equal monthly installments from my wages for the months of May, June, July August, 1902, which shall apply to the respective insurance periods, and that the policy shall be considered binding only for such insurance period as is covered by an installment of premium actually paid, except as to the time fixed for payment of the first installment. 14. Total premium for the four periods, $ 15."

To provide for the payment of the premiums, Brown at the same time executed and delivered to defendant the following order on the paymaster of the railroads therein named:

"Paymaster's Order Or Assignment

"For $ 15. No. 564608.

"Chicago Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.,

"K. C., St. J. & C. B. Railroad.

"For value received I hereby assign of my wages for the months below named, to the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company of California or its authorized general agents, the amount of four premiums for separate insurance contracts, as follows:

"First premium: Three 75-100 dollars, to be paid and deducted from my wages for the month of May, 1902.

"Second premium: Three 75-100 dollars to be paid and deducted from my wages for the month of June, 1902.

"Third premium: Three 75-100 dollars, to be paid and deducted from my wages for the month of July, 1902.

"Fourth premium: Three 75-100 dollars, to be paid and deducted from my wages for the month of August, 1902.

"The first premium being the premium for two months, the first insurance period under policy of insurance issued to me by said company and bearing even date and number herewith; the second premium being the premium for two months, the second insurance period under said policy; the third premium being the premium for three months, the third insurance period under said policy; and the fourth premium being the premium for five months, the fourth insurance period under said policy, all in accordance with the provisions and conditions of said policy and my application for the same.

"If default is made in the payment of any premium at its due date the policy will be void as respects the corresponding and all subsequent periods.

"In consideration of the acceptance of this order or assignment of wages, the undersigned hereby agrees that the same shall not be revoked, cancelled or annulled by notice to any one or otherwise.

"Occupation, machinist. Signature, Seldon F. Brown. Date, April 20, 1902. Where employed, St. Joseph, Missouri. Where you report, St. Joseph. Name of head of department, C. E. Lamb. What division, St. Joseph shops. Write applicant's name in full, plain.

"SELDON F. BROWN."

Thereupon and at the same time the defendant issued to said Seldon F. Brown the policy now sued on, reciting that, "in consideration of the warranties in the application for the policy, and of an order which is to be considered an assignment of money therein specified on the paymaster of the Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad," it thereby insured "Seldon F. Brown of St. Joseph, Missouri, the person named in the application for the period or periods hereinafter specified, beginning at 12 o'clock noon, standard time of the day, this policy is dated. Against bodily injuries sustained through external, violent and accidental means and will pay to him if surviving, or to Myrtle Brown his wife, or in the event of her prior death, to the executors, administrators or assigns of the insured, the indemnity provided in the schedule hereinafter contained, styled:

"Death and Disability.

"(a) If death shall result from such injuries within ninety days, independently of all other causes, the company will pay the principal sum of $ 1,500 which payment shall terminate the policy and discharge the company."

After providing indemnity for certain other losses, such as loss of limb, sight or loss of time, etc., the policy proceeds.

"Subject to the following agreements as conditions:

"10. The payments made in the order or assignment are premiums for separate and consecutive periods of two, three and five months, and each is to apply only to its corresponding insurance period. All claims for injuries received during any period for which the respective premium shall not have been actually paid shall be forfeited to the company.

"Except that in case of just claim before the first premium is due, if the sum due the insured be less than the sum of all the payments called for by the order or assignment, the amount of the claim shall be credited thereon; if greater, the order or assignment shall be receipted in full and the balance paid to the insured. In making settlement for any claim for injuries received during any insurance period for which the premium has been paid, the amount of the premium for later unpaid periods may be deducted from the amount found due.

"11. In case the insured shall fail to leave in the hands of the paymaster, any installment of premium as it shall fall due as agreed in order, this policy shall be void."

The policy is dated April 20, 1902.

No money was paid to defendant by plaintiff in the transaction. So far as the premium is concerned the sole consideration for the issuance of the policy was the agreements contained in the paymaster's order which was on or about April 20, 1902, deposited by defendant with the paymaster of the railroad and left in his possession for his use as a voucher against the deductions authorized by Brown in his order, to be made by the paymaster out of said wages.

It will be noted by reference to this order that by its terms the first deduction and payment of premium was to be made out of the wages for May, 1902. Brown worked that month for the railroad company but the custom of the company was not to pay the wages on the last of the month but on the tenth day of the month succeeding the month in which they were earned unless the employee desired to quit the service, in which case he could receive his wages at any time he demanded them. So that in this instance Brown's wages earned in May were not payable until June 10th, on which date the paymaster gave him a check dated June 1st for $ 52.47 covering his May wages less $ 3.75, the amount of the first premium payable to defendant out of the May wages. This sum was remitted by the paymaster to defendant and was received by it in due course. There is, therefore, no dispute as to the premium having been paid for the first insurance period commencing April 20, 1902, and ending June 20, 1902.

Brown continued to work for the railroad at St. Joseph until June 28th when he quit the service and asked for his "time," that is to say, his wages, earned up to that date, and on that date the paymaster issued to him what is called a "time check" showing in detail the number of hours worked by him, the price per hour and the total sum due him from the railroad company on account of wages. This time check shows that he worked in June, eight and one-half hours at twenty-two and one-half cents per hour, did 177 and one-half hours piece work, for which $ 45.29 was due him, that on account of his leaving the employ of the railroad fifteen cents was returned to him, being his contribution to the relief fund maintained by railroad employees for medical and hospital service and that the total sum due Brown on June 28th was $ 47.35. Appended to this "time check" was his receipt for that amount. Said time check and receipt were read in evidence and are as follows:

"Form 4335.

"Department No. 411. Paymaster's No. 18372.

"Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad.

"St Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad.

"Chicago, Burlington & Kansas City Railroad.

"Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co., Lessee.

"St. Joseph, Mo. 6-28-1902.

"This certifies that S. F. Brown has worked in the month of June as machinist at St. Joseph, Mo.,

"8 1-2 hours at 22 1-2c per hour

$ 1.91

"Relief fund contribution returned

.15

"177 1-2 hours P. W.

45.29

"Balance due

47.35

"Correct: C. M. Mason.

"Approved: C. E. Lamb.

"Received payment for services rendered as above stated. (Sign here.) S. F. BROWN.

"This time check when properly indorsed is payable only to party named hereon by agent at --. ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Blyston-Spencer v. United Railways Company of St. Louis
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • December 5, 1910
  • Gruen v. Standard Life And Accdient Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • December 14, 1912
    ...... STANDARD LIFE AND ACCDIENT INSURANCE COMPANY", Respondent Court of Appeals of Missouri, St. LouisDecember 14, 1912 .  \xC2"... Co., 75 Mo.App. 310; Ritchey v. Insurance Co.,. 104 Mo.App. 146; Brown v. Insurance Co., 109 Mo.App. 137; Marshall v. Insurance Co., 148 Mo.App. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT