Brown v. State

Decision Date14 January 1937
Docket Number26642.
Citation5 N.E.2d 527,211 Ind. 61
PartiesBROWN et al. v. STATE.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

Appeal from Orange Circuit Court; Wilbur W. Hottel, Judge.

Tucker & Tucker, of Paoli, and Connor D. Ross, of Indianapolis for appellants.

Philip Lutz, Jr., Atty. Gen., and Wm. E. Bussell, Deputy Atty. Gen for the State.

HUGHES Judge.

The appellants, plaintiffs below, brought this action for an assessment of damages to their residence property caused by the construction of State Road 56 as it entered Paoli from the northeast. Objections were filed to the amended complaint of the appellant which were sustained, and the court refused to appoint appraisers to fix the damage. The appellants refused to plead further, and judgment was rendered against them and in favor of appellee. From this judgment appellants appeal.

The error relied upon for reversal is the refusal of the court to make an order appointing appraisers, and error in sustaining appellee's demurrer, in the form of objections, to appellant's complaint.

The complaint of appellants, among other things, alleges:

'That immediately east of the town of Paoli is a steep hill which slopes toward and within the corporate limits of said town that Campbell street in said town extends in an easterly and westerly direction and extends upgrade on that part of the hill within said town; that Third Street in said town extends in a northerly and southerly direction and over said hill at a point near the foot thereof and crosses Campbell Street that plaintiff's real estate is located in the northwest corner of the intersection of Third and Campbell Streets; that Thornton Street, which extends east and west, and Main Street, which extends in an easterly and westerly direction, are the first streets north and south, respectively, of Campbell Street; and that Third Street, as laid out and used prior to said construction work by the defendant, gradually rises from Thornton Street, or is upgrade, to Campbell St., from which point it gradually declines to Main Street, and that the highest point in said elevation between Thornton and Main Streets, is at the intersection of Campbell and Third Streets as aforesaid.

'That in said Construction work, State Highway No. 56 has been relocated in part and especially at and within the corporate limits of Paoli; that, prior to said construction work, it entered said town by way of Main Street; that said State Highway now as so laid out, relocated and constructed by defendant, through said commission, enters the town of Paoli from the northeast around the north side of said hill, curves to the south and intersects Third Street at a point a short distance north of the intersection of Third and Campbell Streets and extends over and upon a part of Third Street as previously laid out and used, to the south where said highway connects with Main Street, which said Main Street has heretofore been designated and improved by said defendant through said commission as State Highway No. 150; that the point of intersection of said highway No. 56 with Third Street is as aforesaid at the highest point between Thornton Street and Main Street. That said state highway as constructed does not meet the grade at the intersection of Third and Campbell Streets as it existed before the relocation and construction of said state highway and that at the highest point between Thornton Street and Main Street, which is at the intersection of Campbell Street and Third Street, as aforesaid, the defendant, through said commission, has constructed the grade of said highway to an elevation of approximately 11 feet above the grade of said streets at said intersection. That by reason of the construction of said grade it was impossible for traffic on that part of Third Street north of its intersection with Campbell Street to enter upon said state highway as so constructed and it was also impossible for traffic on Campbell Street from the west to enter upon said state highway from Campbell Street. That, in order to permit traffic, on Third Street north of Campbell Street to enter upon said highway, said defendant, through said commission, has constructed a steep approach on Third Street from the north to meet the grade of said State Highway; and, to permit traffic from the west on Campbell Street to enter upon said highway, defendant, through said commission, has constructed a steep approach on Campbell Street along the south side of plaintiff's property to meet the grade of said State Highway. That by reason of the construction of the grade of said highway as aforesaid and the construction of said approaches on Third and Campbell Streets, respectively, plaintiffs' property is now approximately eleven (11) feet below the grade of said State Highway and the approaches at the intersection as so constructed by defendant.

'That, in the construction of said highway and the grade thereof as aforesaid, the defendant, through said commission has taken and acquired lands and rights beyond the limits of Third Street and Campbell Street and has moved the traveled way of Third Street so that the center line of the new state highway is east of the center line of Third Street as previously laid out and used and that, by reason there of, a strip off the west side of said street and north of Campbell Street has not been used in the construction of said grade and approach thereon, but has been practically abandoned and, as it now exists, forms a partial 'dead-end' street by reason of the construction of the approach on Campbell Street.

'That in the construction of said highway and the grade and approaches as aforesaid these plaintiffs have been deprived of valuable rights in this: That long prior to the construction of said highway their said lot was on approximately the same grade as the grades of Third Street and Campbell Street, respectively, and the buildings thereon were erected in conformity to the grades of such streets that, by reason thereof, their said property was afforded the full use and enjoyment of said streets as to the rights of ingress, egress, light, vision, air, and drainage; That by reason of the construction of said grade and approaches the only means of ingress and egress to and from plaintiff's premises by means of a vehicle are by way of Thornton Street hence on Third Street along the west side of said approach on Third Street as now constructed and, by reason of the construction of said approach on Third Street, it is inconvenient and almost impossible to leave said premises in a vehicle without backing or reversing it to a point on Third Street beyond the north of the beginning point of the approach on said street. That, by reason of the construction of said grade and approaches, water, dirt, mud and filth are washed down on plaintiff's premises to the great damage thereof and to the inconvenience and injury of plaintiffs in the use and occupancy thereof; and the drainage facilities along said streets have been hampered and damaged. That by reason of said construction, the use and enjoyment of Third Street and Campbell Street respectively, as such streets, as to plaintiffs' said property, has been destroyed, and that no part of said construction was done and performed as an improvement of or for the use of said streets as previously laid out and improved, but...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT