Brown v. State
Decision Date | 27 June 1913 |
Citation | 162 S.W. 339 |
Parties | BROWN v. STATE. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Bastrop County; Ed R. Sinks, Judge.
E. F. Brown was convicted as a private banker of receiving deposits with knowledge of his insolvency and the insolvency of the bank, and he appeals.Reversed and remanded.
Orgain & Maynard and Paul D. Page, all of Bastrop, W. G. Love, of Houston, and W. F. Ramsey, of Austin, for appellant.C. E. Lane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Appellant was prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary under the following indictment, omitting the formal parts:
Appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment on several grounds; the first being that, while the indictment alleged that the bank was a private bank, yet it failed to allege the names of the persons composing the bank.A reference to the indictment will disclose that the indictment not only alleged that it was an unincorporated private bank, but also alleged that appellant was the owner of the bank, and the indictment also alleges not only that the bank was insolvent, but also alleges the insolvency of appellant, the owner of the bank.We have carefully read and considered each ground in the motion to quash, and are of the opinion none of them are well taken.We think the indictment sufficiently and plainly alleges, in accordance with the provisions of article 532 of the Penal Code, the offense denounced by this statute against a private bank or banker.
H. W. Freeman testified:
A.De Glandon, Sr., testified to making a deposit of $50 at the time stated by Mr. Freeman.This testimony was objected to on the ground that the transaction took place in the absence of the defendant and would not be binding on him.The record discloses that appellant established the McDade Exchange Bank, and that he was the sole owner of the bank.When he opened this bank, he did so for the purpose of doing a banking business, the element of a banking business being the reception of deposits from its patrons and the public generally, and when he established this business, placed men in charge of it, had reports mailed to him, it would be immaterial whether or not he ever visited the bank again; he in law would be held to have given his assent to all steps necessary and proper in the conducting of a banking business at McDade, and, as this bank was opened by him and a part of its business at least was to solicit and receive deposits, he would be held to have given his assent to each and every deposit received by the bank, including the deposit received from Mr. De Glandon, Sr.
The receiving of deposits is a necessary incident to a legitimate banking business, and when appellant established the bank and opened it for business, placing his agents and employés in charge, to do a banking business, he will in law be held to have given his assent to each and every act within the scope of business authorized by him to be done by his agents and employés.
When Cashier Freeman had testified he kept the books of the bank and they were correctly kept, it was legitimate for the state to show by the witness, refreshing his memory from the books so kept by him, the amount, character, and value of the resources of the McDade Exchange Bank, and the debts and liabilities of the bank on the date it closed its doors.
Several objections were urged to the testimony of State Banking Commissioner Gill.Appellant owned the Paige State Bank as well as the McDade Exchange Bank, and, as it was necessary to show the insolvency of appellant at the time of the failure of the McDade Exchange Bank as well as the insolvency of the bank, it was perfectly legitimate to show whether or not the Paige State Bank was at that time insolvent, and the value of all properties owned by appellant, his debts and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Allen v. State
...162 S. W. 512; Scott v. State, 42 Tex. Cr. R. 607, 62 S. W. 419; Garrett v. State, 61 Tex. Cr. R. 515, 135 S. W. 532; Brown v. State, 71 Tex. Cr. R. 353, 162 S. W. 339. Venue may be proved by circumstantial evidence (Steadham v. State, 40 Tex. Cr. R. 43, 48 S. W. 177; Pye v. State, 71 Tex. ......
-
Haynes v. State
...847, C.C.P.; Green v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 2, 32 S.W.2d 650." See also Belcher v. State, 71 Tex.Cr.R. 646, 161 S.W. 459; Brown v. State, 71 Tex. Cr.R. 353, 162 S.W. 339; Brady v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 606, 22 S.W.2d Appellant also contends that there are two separate and distinct statutes de......
-
Morris v. State, 35819
...used to prove value. Esparza v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 367 S.W.2d 861; Holmes v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 587, 72 S.W.2d 1092; Brown v. State, 71 Tex.Cr.R. 353, 162 S.W. 339; 1 Wharton Criminal Evidence 12th Ed. 620, Sec. We overrule the contention that the testimony above quoted was without proba......
-
Smith v. State
...v. State (1911) 62 Tex. Cr. R. 653, 139 S. W. 598;Appelget et al. v. State (1926) 33 Okl. Cr. 125, 243 P. 251;Brown v. State (1913) 71 Tex. Cr. R. 353, 162 S. W. 339. See discussion in 37 Central Law Journal 174. Our attention has been called to the case of Federal Reserve Bank, etc., v. Id......