Brown v. State
Decision Date | 29 January 1996 |
Citation | 668 So.2d 602 |
Parties | Devon Brown v. State NO. 86,966 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial6 cases
-
Skidmore v. State, 96-2343
... ... Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), review denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996); Barnes v. State, 643 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Gainer v. State, 590 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Simmons v. State, 579 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). As stated above, this 3.850 is untimely. But even if ... ...
-
White v. State, 97-3003
... ... See Thomas v. State, 686 So.2d 699 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), review denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996) ... Accordingly, we affirm the order of summary denial. Affirmance is without prejudice to White's filing a new motion that complies with the requirements of rule 3.850(c). The amended motion ... ...
-
Thomas v. State, 95-3008
... ... Compare Kendall v. State, 619 So.2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (failure of notary section of motion to comport with technical requirements of notary statute not basis for summary denial of 3.850 relief) with Brown v. State, 661 So.2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (trial court properly denied motion as legally insufficient where it neither was under oath nor included requisite contents of rule 3.850(c)), review denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996). We agree, however, that the trial court's order of dismissal should ... ...
-
Lawson v. State
... ... See Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant's timely refiling of a properly sworn motion. See, e.g., Steele v. State, 705 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Brown" v. State, 661 So.2d 95, 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), rev. denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996); Stoutamire v. State, 710 So.2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) ... \xC2" ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results