Brown v. State, BP-379

• Decision Date: 23 June 1987
• Docket Number: No. BP-379,BP-379
• Citation: Brown v. State, 509 So.2d 1164, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1528 (Fla. App. 1987)
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals
• Parties: 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1528 Marcus L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Page 1164

509 So.2d 1164

12 Fla. L. Weekly 1528

Marcus L. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BP-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida First District.

June 23, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 1987.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

NIMMONS, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his sentencing guidelines upward-departure sentence of life imprisonment. The sole reason given by the trial court for departure was the defendant's adjudication as an habitual offender under Section 775.084, Florida Statutes. The judge relied expressly upon this court's decision in Whitehead v. State, 467 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) which was, during the pendency of this appeal, reversed by the Florida Supreme Court at 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).

The state, however, still urges affirmance. It argues that since the defendant was convicted of a first degree felony, his adjudication as an habitual offender required imposition of a mandatory term of life imprisonment by reason of Section 775.084(4)(a)(1), and that such mandatory sentence takes precedence over the lesser guidelines sentence under Fla.R.Cr.P. 3.701(d)(9).

The state's argument must fail because this court in Walker v. State, 499 So.2d 884, 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), has construed the Supreme Court's Whitehead opinion to preclude reliance upon habitual offender status for...