Brown v. State
Decision Date | 25 November 1996 |
Docket Number | No. S96A1378,S96A1378 |
Citation | 267 Ga. 350,478 S.E.2d 129 |
Parties | , 96 FCDR 4149 BROWN v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Muscogee County Superior Trial Judge: William J. Smith.
Clark Coleman Adams, Jr., Hagler, Hyles & Adams, Columbus, for John O. Brown.
John Gray Conger, Dist. Atty., Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit, Columbus, Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, Melvin Estus Hyde, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit, Columbus, Beth Attaway, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Law, Atlanta, for State.
John O. Brown, Valdosta, for other interested parties.
John O. Brown was convicted by a jury of the malice murder of David McKenzie, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime.He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentences entered thereon.1
Brown does not deny killing McKenzie, but claims that he did so in self-defense after McKenzie attempted to shoot him.Brown spent the night before the shooting at the home of Mary Nell Lamb.At approximately 8:00 a.m. the following morning, Lamb's boyfriend, McKenzie, arrived and engaged in a discussion with Lamb in the doorway of her home.Lamb testified that she was having a calm discussion with McKenzie when Brown exited a bedroom, pushed her out of the way, and shot McKenzie in the shoulder.McKenzie, who was unarmed, fled from the apartment.Lamb attempted to prevent Brown from following in pursuit, but he pushed her to the floor and ran after McKenzie into the parking lot of the apartment complex, where gunshots were fired.Lamb's cousin, who had also spent the night in the apartment, testified to the same sequence of events.Although neither Lamb nor her cousin witnessed what occurred in the parking lot, several neighbors did.Three eyewitnesses testified that they saw Brown standing over the victim shooting him as the victim lay on the pavement with his arms raised toward Brown.
Brown testified in his own defense that he came out of the bedroom after hearing McKenzie arguing with Lamb.When McKenzie reached for a pistol, Brown shot him in the shoulder.McKenzie ran into the parking lot where Brown fired two shots into his hand and then "finally had to shoot him in his head."
1.The evidence was sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560(1979), to find Brown guilty of the crimes for which he was convicted.
2.While Brown contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the State's burden to prove the absence of self-defense, this assertion is belied by the record.The trial court properly...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Taylor v. State
...that admits the doing of the act charged but seeks to justify, excuse, or mitigate it.... Once the issue of an affirmative defense is raised, the burden is on the State to disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt." The trial court then instructed the jury on the legal principle of justification. "Considered as a whole, the charge fully conveyed to the jury the state's burden of disproving the affirmative defense of justification."
Brown v. State, 267 Ga. 350, 351(2), 478 S.E.2d 129 (1996).... -
Code v. State
...502 S.E.2d 540 (1998). 6. Plunkett v. State, 244 Ga.App. 504, 505, 535 S.E.2d 852 (2000). 7. See generally McKissic v. State, 201 Ga.App. 525, 411 S.E.2d 516 (1991). 8.
Brown v. State, 267 Ga. 350, 351, 478 S.E.2d 129 (1996), see OCGA § 9. Hightower v. State, 224 Ga.App. 703, 705(2), 481 S.E.2d 867 (1997). 10. Alexis v. State, 273 Ga. 423, 426(4), 541 S.E.2d 636 (2001), see also Porter v. State, 272 Ga. 533, 534(3), 531 S.E.2d... -
Hicks v. The State
...( “[j]ustification is an affirmative defense whereby the defendant admits acting with the intent to inflict an injury, but claims that he did so while in reasonable fear of suffering immediate serious harm to himself or another”);
Brown v. State, 267 Ga. 350(2), 478 S.E.2d 129 (1996)(“ ‘[a]n affirmative defense is a defense that admits the doing of the act charged but seeks to justify, excuse, or mitigate it’ Lightning v. State, 297 Ga.App. 54(5), 676 S.E.2d 780 (2009) (a defendant... -
Scott v. State
...precludes appellate review.8 Judgment affirmed. Andrews, P. J., and Eldridge, J., concur. 1 Alexis v. State, 273 Ga. 423, 426 (4) (541 SE2d 636) (2001). 2 See
Brown v. State, 267 Ga. 350, 351 (2) (478 SE2d 129) (1996); see generally OCGA § 16-3-21. 3 Emerson v. State, 222 Ga. App. 596, 597 (2) (b) (474 SE2d 638) (1996). 4 262 Ga. 359, 359-360 (2) (418 SE2d 52) (1992). 5 We will address this enumeration although the record, which does include a...