Brown v. V & R Advertising, Inc.

Decision Date18 March 1986
Citation500 N.Y.S.2d 506,67 N.Y.2d 772
Parties, 491 N.E.2d 679 Bruce BROWN, Appellant, v. V & R ADVERTISING, INC., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Prior report: 112 A.D.2d 856, 493 N.Y.S.2d 137.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division.

WACHTLER, C.J., and MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
11 cases
  • Koob v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Julio 1995
    ...37 N.Y.2d 91, 96, 371 N.Y.S.2d 463, 332 N.E.2d 333; Brown v. V & R Adv., 112 A.D.2d 856, 861, 493 N.Y.S.2d 137, affd. 67 N.Y.2d 772, 500 N.Y.S.2d 506, 491 N.E.2d 679), the employment agreement in question expressly reserves the right of respondents to seek injunctive relief to enforce the r......
  • Olympia & York OLP Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 27 Abril 1995
    ...aff'd 69 N.Y.2d 725, 512 N.Y.S.2d 367, 504 N.E.2d 694; Brown v. V & R Adv., 112 A.D.2d 856, 861, 493 N.Y.S.2d 137, aff'd 67 N.Y.2d 772, 500 N.Y.S.2d 506, 491 N.E.2d 679). There is no question that the dispute herein "falls squarely within the purview of the arbitration provision" contained ......
  • Manhattan Residential Inc. v. Elliman, 2007 NY Slip Op 32519(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 8/10/2007)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 10 Agosto 2007
    ...v Elmira Say. Bank, FSB 134 F.3d 72,77 (2d Cir. 1998); see Brown v V & R Advertising, Inc., 112 A.D.2d 856, 861 [1st Dept 1985], affd 67 N.Y.2d 772 1986] ["Once the courts have determined that there is a reasonable relationship between the arbitration ... clause and the subject matter of th......
  • Schenkers Intern. Forwarders, Inc. v. Meyer
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 Enero 1991
    ...the agreement which must be referred to arbitration (Brown v. V & R Adv., 112 A.D.2d 856, 861, 493 N.Y.S.2d 137, affd., 67 N.Y.2d 772, 500 N.Y.S.2d 506, 491 N.E.2d 679; Matter of Popular Publ. [McCall Corp.], supra Accordingly, the judgment (denominated order/judgment) of the Supreme Court,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT