Browne v. Park Cemetery
Decision Date | 01 May 1917 |
Citation | 101 A. 34,78 N.H. 387 |
Parties | BROWNE v. PARK CEMETERY. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Transferred from Superior Court, Belknap County; Kivel, Judge.
Proceeding for the laying out of land for the Park Cemetery by the selectmen of the town of Tilton, wherein Belle P. Browne objected. From the laying out, Browne appealed. On transfer without a ruling. Case discharged.
The defendant is a voluntary corporation organized July 8, 1851, for the purposes of providing, holding, and keeping in repair suitable grounds and other conveniences for the burial of the dead, and claims the right to take the plaintiff's land under the following statute passed March 6, 1913:
"All the acts and proceedings of an association called and known as Park Cemetery located in the town of Tilton (formerly in Sanbornton) be, and the same are hereby ratified and made legal, and the said Park Cemetery as now organized shall have ail the rights and powers, and be subject to all the liabilities which towns by statute possess concerning cemeteries, by and under sections 4 and 6 of chapter 40 of the Public Statutes, and shall be called and known as Park Cemetery." Laws 1913, c. 311, § 1.
Stephen S. Jewett, of Laconia, for plaintiff. Charles C. Rogers, of Tilton, Robert Jackson, of Concord, and Branch & Branch, of Manchester, for defendant.
By section 6, c. 40, P. S., towns are authorized to take land in invitum for public use. The use of land for the establishment and maintenance of a cemetery' for the burial of the dead may be a public use. Rockingham Light & Power Co. v. Hobbs, 72 N. H. 531, 533, 58 Atl. 46, (56 L R. A. 581; Crowell v. Londonderry, 63 N. H. 42; Evergreen Cemetery Association v. New Haven, 43 Conn. 234, 21 Am. Rep. 643.
Starr Burying Ground Ass'n v. Association, 77 Conn. 83, 58 Atl. 467.
The plaintiff bases her objection to the constitutionality of the statute invoked by the defendant upon the elementary principle that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cyers Woolen Co. v. Town of Gilsum
...domain the public acquire a right." Holt v. Antrim, 64 N. H. 284, 287, 9 A. 389, 390. The same principle was applied in Brown v. Cemetery, 78 N. H. 387, 101 A. 34, and McMillan v. Noyes, 75 N. H. 258, 263, 72 A. 759. Wherever this feature is lacking, it follows that there is nothing upon wh......
-
Davie v. Rochester Cemetery Ass'n
...of the dead." Starr, etc., Ass'n v. North Lane Cemetery Association, 77 Conn. 83, 58 A. 467, cited with approval in Brown v. Park Cemetery, 78 N.H. 387, 388, 101 A. 34. The cemetery for the care of which the defendant association was organized is known as the Rochester Cemetery, a brief his......
-
Petition of Tuttle
...duties designated. Webster v. Sughrow, 69 N. H. 380, 45 Atl. 139, 48 L. B. A. 100; Crowell v. Londonderry, 03 N. H. 42; Brown v. Cemetery, 78 N. H. 387, 101 Atl. 34. The doctrine of perpetuities therefore has no application. Bolfe & Bumford Asylum v. Lefebre, 69 N. H. 238, 45 Atl. 1087; Mer......
-
Why Kelo Is Not Good News for Local Planners and Developers
...treatment plants, cemeteries, and library parking lots. See Molloy v. Town of Exeter, 218 A.2d 52 (N.H. 1966); Browne v. Park Cemetery, 101 A. 34 (N.H. 1917); Lyford v. City of Laconia, 72 A. 1085 (N.H. 1909). 140. Sw. 111. Dev. Auth. v. Nat'l City Envtl., 768 N.E.2d 1 (111. 2002). 141. Id.......