Browne v. Strode
| Decision Date | 31 December 1809 |
| Citation | 9 U.S. 303,5 Cranch 303 |
| Parties | BROWNE AND OTHERS v. STRODE. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
THE COURT ordered it to be certified, as their opinion, that the court below has jurisdiction in the case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Navarro Savings Association v. Lee
...not "naked trustees" who act as "mere conduits" for a remedy flowing to others. McNutt v. Bland, 2 How., at 13-14; see Browne v. Strode, 5 Cranch 303, 3 L.Ed. 108 (1809). They have legal title; they manage the assets; they control the litigation. In short, they are real parties to the contr......
-
Nakken Patents Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.
...parties, and that the joining of merely nominal or formal parties cannot have the effect of excluding jurisdiction, Browne v. Strode, 5 Cranch 303, 3 L.Ed. 108; Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 421, 5 L.Ed. 651; McNutt v. Bland, 2 How. 9, 11 L.Ed. 159; Wood v. Davis, 18 How. 467, 15 L.Ed. 460; ......
-
Kansas City, Mo., ex rel. Gemco, Inc. v. AMERICAN CONCR. FORMS, INC., Civ. A. No. 18656-3.
...as the formal obligee of a bond, for the benefit of private individuals, the citizenship of the individuals controls. Browne v. Strode, 1809, 5 Cranch 303, 3 L.Ed. 108; McNutt for Use of Leggett v. Bland, 1844, 2 How. 9, 11 L.Ed. 159; Howard v. U. S., 1902, 22 S.Ct. 543, 184 U.S. 676, 46 L.......
-
Vimont v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company
...resulting in the exclusion of federal jurisdiction. This is not a case where the plaintiff could be regarded as a mere conduit, as in Browne v. Strode and McNutt Bland, above cited. If he were reduced to something less than a trustee, he would sustain no legal relation to the claim whatever......
Request a trial to view additional results