Browning v. Navarro
Decision Date | 26 August 1987 |
Docket Number | No. 86-1444,86-1444 |
Parties | Jane H. BROWNING, Individually and as Co-Independent Executrix of the Estate of William W. Browning, Jr., Deceased, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross- Appellees, v. Don NAVARRO, Individually and As Trustee for Pat S. Holloway, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. Pat S. HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Thomas V. Murto, III, R. Jack Ayres, Jr., Dennis Olson, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants, cross-appellees.
Cheryl Ann Sigsbee, Timothy J. Vineyard, Scott C. Larsen, Dallas, Tex., for Navarro.
Pat S. Holloway, Giddings, Tex., pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before POLITZ, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
This unrelenting battle between the Brownings and the Holloways, which began in 1979, is a familiar fray to this court. It has been marched up the hill to us several times before. We march it back down once again.
The state court judgment, which the Brownings seek to enforce in the bankruptcy court against Holloway and his assets, may involve more than $100,000,000, and we suppose, would pretty much wipe out Holloway if enforced. Yet for various reasons he has never had consideration, by either the federal or state courts, of the merits of his colorable claim that the state court judgment resulted from the corrupt abuse of the judicial process. Today we remand to allow consideration of his claim that the state court judgment was procured by fraud. We reject, however, each and every other argument he makes and trust that we have sufficiently narrowed this case so that the litigation can be concluded with the disposition of this single issue. 1
Renditions of the facts in this case and related cases already fill many pages of the federal reporter system, 2 but we repeat them here for the sake of clarity.
....
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Browning v. Navarro
...I, 743 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir.1984). In Browning II we stated that there were only two issues left to be decided on remand. Browning II, 826 F.2d 335, 346 (5th Cir.1987). Holloway could argue that the Walker judgment was void because it was obtained by fraud. The Brownings could argue that Holl......
-
Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
...856, 293 N.Y.S.2d 20 (App.Div.1968) (affirming injunction barring, inter alia, enforcement of a Greek court decree); Browning v. Navarro, 826 F.2d 335 (5th Cir.1987) (instructing district court to consider whether state court judgment was procured by fraud and may be set aside); Ellerman Li......
-
In re Garafano, Bankruptcy No. 88-12589S
...of the debtor and that the debtor was prevented by fraud from raising a valid defense. 249 F.2d at 224-25. In Browning v. Navarro, 826 F.2d 335, 344-45 (5th Cir.1987), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that allegations of collusion and corrupt use of the judicial process could serve a......
-
In re Waugh, Bankruptcy No. 07-21511 (Bankr.N.D.Ind. 2/5/2009)
...997 F.2d at 304 + N. 7 (Citing, Heiser v. Woodruff, 327 U.S. 726, 736, 66 S. Ct. 853, 857, 90 L. Ed. 2d 970 (1946), and Browning v. Navarro, 826 F.2d 335 (5th Cir. 1987)). See also, In the Matter of Brady, Texas, Municipal Gas Corporation, 936 F.2d 212, 218 (5th Cir. 1991) (Collecting cases......