Brownson v. State
| Decision Date | 20 December 1909 |
| Citation | Brownson v. State, 123 S.W. 762, 93 Ark. 20 (Ark. 1909) |
| Parties | BROWNSON v. STATE |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Benton Circuit Court; Joseph S. Maples, Judge; affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
J. A Rice, for appellant.
The mere keeping of malt tonic for sale openly and without the aid or intervention of a device of some kind is not unlawful.45 Ark. 173.The stuff sold or kept for sale must contain the elements necessary to constitute an intoxicating liquor in such form as it may be used as a beverage.69 Ark. 361.
Hal L Norwood, Attorney General, and C. A. Cunningham, Assistant for appellee.
To sell malt liquor indirectly, as by furnishing it as a medicine, rather than directly over the counter, is a device, pure and simple, such as the law was intended to prohibit.22 S.W. 370;85 N.W. 12;Black on Intox. Liq., § § 405 and 456.That the officers found either liquor or a United States license on the premises searched makes a prima facie case against the defendant.77 Ark. 143;83 Ark. 102;88 Ark. 393.The law forbids the maintaining of a place where liquors are either sold or given away.Kirby'sDig., § § 5140 to 5148;86 Ark. 567.The statute prohibits the sale of such drinks as a beverage, whether intoxicating or not.Kirby'sDig., § 5093;56 Ark. 444;69 Ark. 360.An objection to an instruction cannot be heard here for the first time.1 Ark. 349.
Appellant was arrested and tried before a justice of the peace in Benton County upon information filed by the prosecuting attorney charging him with violating the "blind tiger"statute.In the information appellant is charged with using and controlling a certain house in the town of Monte Ne in which he is engaged in conducting a drug business, and that openly and secretly by means of device he unlawfully did sell and give away, and cause to be sold and given away, and kept and allowed to be kept for sale and to be given away, alcoholic, ardent, vinous, malt and fermented liquors and intoxicating spirits and compounds, etc.He was convicted before the justice of the peace, and on appeal to the circuit court a trial before a jury resulted in a conviction, and he appeals to this court.
Upon the filing of the information before the justice of the peace, a warrant was issued for the arrest of appellant, and an order for the search of his premises, and, upon search being made, the officers found in the house a large number of bottles of liquor called "Shuster's Malt and Hop Liquid," stored under the counter.The bottles were in a barrel, which originally contained 100 bottles, but which had only 80 bottles in it when found.This liquor was proved to be nothing more nor less than beer, or, as the witnesses describe it, a cheap grade of beer.It is also conceded to contain a small per cent. of alcohol.The officer also found in the house a special tax stamp issued by authority of the United States to appellant, denoting the payment of special tax on the sale of liquor.This receipt was exhibited to the officers by appellant.The statute under which appellant was tried is as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Kinnanne v. State
... ... escape the jurisdiction of the Arkansas courts and to ... clandestinely make a sale of intoxicating liquors. We think ... the facts and circumstances adduced in evidence show that the ... sale was by a device within the meaning of the statute ... Glass v. State, 45 Ark. 173; ... Brownson v. State, 93 Ark. 20, 123 S.W ... Finally, ... it is insisted by counsel for the defendant that the court ... erred in its instruction to the jury on the question of the ... boundary line between the States of Arkansas and ... ...
-
Schaal v. State
...No. 2 is inapplicable to the question at issue and was properly refused. It is not error to refuse to give an inapplicable instruction. 93 Ark. 20; 99 Ark. 648; 90 570; 29 Ark. 17. Provocation will not justify the use of opprobrious words. 8 R. C. L. Sec. 307, p. 286. OPINION WOOD, J. This ......
-
Kinnane v. State
...adduced in evidence show that the sale was by a device, within the meaning of the statute. Glass v. State, 45 Ark. 173; Brownson v. State, 93 Ark. 20, 123 S. W. 762. Finally, it is insisted by counsel for the defendant that the court erred in its instruction to the jury on the question of t......