Broxson v. Wainwright

Decision Date02 February 1967
Docket NumberNo. 23957.,23957.
Citation372 F.2d 944
PartiesWillard BROXSON, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Willard Broxson, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., James G. Mahorner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BELL and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Broxson, a Florida state prisoner serving concurrent sentences entered on pleas of guilty to robbery and attempted robbery, was denied habeas corpus relief in the District Court. As we stated in Busby v. Holman, 5 Cir., 1966, 356 F.2d 75, a plea of guilty, if voluntarily and understandingly made, is conclusive as to the defendant's guilt, admitting all of the facts charged and waiving all non-jurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings against him. The threshold question, given the fact of a guilty plea, is whether the plea of guilty was voluntarily and understandingly made. Thus the sole question presented on this appeal is whether Broxson's allegations form such a contrary basis as to warrant reversal for a hearing on the question of whether the pleas of guilty were coerced. All of the other errors asserted occurred prior to the pleas and may not now form the basis for collateral relief until and unless the pleas of guilty are set aside.

We have carefully studied the application for writ of habeas corpus as well as the entire file and have reached the firm conclusion that the allegations, taken separately or in sum, fail to make out a basis for a hearing on the issue of coercion. The District Court did not err in denying the relief sought.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Creel v. Estelle
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • May 2, 1977
    ...465, 96 S.Ct. 3037, 49 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1976). The application should therefore be denied without an evidentiary hearing. Broxson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 372 F.2d 944 (1967); Rogers v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 394 F.2d 492 (1968); Hernandez v. Scheckloth, 9 Cir., 425 F.2d 89 (1970); Mackey v. Oberha......
  • Streets v. Wainwright, 25982.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 15, 1968
    ...of law, if the plea was involuntary or coerced. Busby v. Holman, 5 Cir. 1966, 356 F.2d 75; Murphy v. Wainwright, supra; Broxson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1967, 372 F.2d 944; Carpenter v. Wainwright, supra. Allegations sufficient to raise a material factual issue concerning the voluntariness of ......
  • Carpenter v. Wainwright, 24026.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 2, 1967
    ...Busby v. Holman, 5 Cir., 1966, 356 F.2d 75; Murphy v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 942, this day decided; and Broxson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 944 this day We think the allegations of the petition for the writ here make out a case requiring a plenary hearing within the te......
  • Wade v. Wainwright, 25138.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 14, 1967
    ...v. Johnston (1942), 316 U.S. 101, 62 S.Ct. 964, 86 L.Ed. 1302; Carpenter v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 940; Broxson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 944; Murphy v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 942. The decision of the district court which denied this petition for a writ o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT