Bruce v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.
Decision Date | 31 December 1924 |
Docket Number | No. 24277.,24277. |
Citation | 271 S.W. 762 |
Parties | BRUCE v. MISSOURI PAC. R. CO. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; J. Hugo Grimm, Judge.
Action by Joseph Bruce against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
Edw. J. White, James F. Green, and Merritt U. Hayden, all of St. Louis, for appellant,
Foristel, Mudd, Hezel & Habenicht and Thomas L. Anderson, all of St. Louis, for respondent.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against the appellant for $25,000 for personal injuries. The original suit was brought on May 4, 1920, against the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis and the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. Thereafter a second amended petition was filed in which the Terminal Railroad Association and the appellant were named as defendants. Later plaintiff dismissed as to the Terminal Railroad Association.
The Terminal Railroad Association owns and operates the passenger station known as the Union Station in St. Louis. The station extends from Twentieth street on the west to Eighteenth street on the east, and from Market street on the north to Walnut street on the south. South of the station proper a train shed extends 600 feet. Beginning with track No. 1, on the west side, and extending to track No. 32, on the east side, there are 32 parallel tracks under this shed. Immediately south of the train shed is a board walk about ten feet wide. It is a passage for railroad business only. It is not a public crossing; the public is not admitted to it. Passenger trains are constantly arriving at and departing from the station over these tracks, at all hours of the day and night.
Plaintiff was struck by one of the appellant's regular passenger trains while it was backing into Union Station on August 31, 1917. According to plaintiff's testimony, he had been employed by the association for 18 years. He had been gradually promoted, and at the time of the accident, and for 3 years prior thereto, was night foreman of the passenger department. He had 25 or 30 men working under him. His working hours were from 6 o'clock p. m. to 6 o'clock a. m. His work took him all over the yards and all around the vicinity of the station. He had been at the station and around the tracks there the night before he was hurt. He was there nearly every night, and was familiar with the location of the tracks and with the operation of the trains in and out of the station and with what is called the puzzle switch, located 100 feet or more south of the train shed.
On the morning of August 31, 1917, plaintiff received an order from the general foreman to appear at the pay car to identify some men who were to be paid. We quote a portion of plaintiff's testimony:
We quote from appellant's statement, which is conceded to be correct except as to the distance within which the conductor testified he could have stopped the train.
Barsch, being recalled, testified the train could have been stopped within 11 to 16 feet at the time and place of the injury.
When plaintiff entered the yards, he walked east along the board walk until he came to track 10 or 11, when he cut across in a southeasterly direction towards the pay car on track 17. From that time, he testified, he looked north and south but saw no train; never saw the train that struck him, nor heard any warning. The last he remembers is that he was looking southeast towards the pay car. He sustained a cut on the forehead about half an inch long and a cut two or three inches long over the right ear. The first cut healed in a few days, leaving a very small scar; the other healed probably in a month. He was in the hospital two days and went back four or five times for treatment. He had some bruises on his chest and on his left thigh. He returned to his usual duties September 8, 1917, and continued in the service of the association until April 23, 1919. In about a week after resuming work, he experienced a numbness in his left hand and left leg. This numbness gradually increased until on the night of April 23, 1919, his left side became and has ever since remained almost completely paralyzed and his mind somewhat impaired. He was about 57 years of age at the time of the accident, in perfect health, and with good eyesight and hearing.
It is unnecessary to summarize the evidence for the appellant. It did not aid plaintiff's case. At the close of all the testimony, the court overruled a demurrer to the evidence. In respondent's elaborate brief and argument, learned counsel say:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Koonse v. Mo. Pac. Railroad Co.
... 18 S.W.2d 467 ... FERNIA KOONSE, Administratrix of Estate of MELBOURNE M. KOONSE, ... MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant ... No. 27609 ... Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2 ... April 5, 1929 ... [18 S.W.2d 468] ... Ry. Co., 281 Fed. 784; Degonia v. Railway Co., 224 Mo. 564; Evans v. Railway Co., 178 Mo. 508; Gabal v. Railway Co., 251 Mo. 257; Bruce v. Railway Co., 271 S.W. 762; Hammontree v. Payne, 296 Mo. 487; Riddell v. Railroad, 316 Mo. 960. There being no substantial evidence of the ... ...
-
Hasenjaeger v. Railroad Co., 21948.
... ... STERNBERG, DECEASED, RESPONDENT, ... MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT ... No. 21948 ... St. Louis Court of ... Ct. Rep. 495; Delaware, L. & W.R. Co. v. Koske, 279 U.S. 7, 49 Sup. Ct. Rep. 202; Southern Pac. Co. v. Berkshire, 254 U.S. 415, 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 162; Toledo, St. L. & W.R. Co. v. Allen, 276 U.S ... 308, 202 S.W. 638, L.R.A. 1918D 925; Rashall v. St. Louis, I.M. & R., 249 Mo. 509; Bruce v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. (Mo. Supp.), 271 S.W. 762; Gabal v. Railroad, 251 Mo. 257, 158 S.W. 12. (5) ... ...
-
Francis v. Terminal Railroad Assn.
... ... LOUIS, a Corporation, Appellant ... No. 39573 ... Supreme Court of Missouri ... Division Two, April 8, 1946 ... Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Banc Overruled, ... Co. v. Zachary, 232 U.S. 248, 58 L. Ed. 591; Lee v. So. P.R. Co., 116 Cal. 97, 47 Pac. 932; Abbott v. Johnstown, G. & K.R. Co., 80 N.Y. 27; Murray v. Lehigh Valley R. Co., 66 Conn. 512, ... Penn. R. Co., 201 Fed. 54; Cain v. Fort Worth & Denver City R. Co. 75 Fed. (2d) 103; Bruce v. Mo. Pac. R. Co., 271 S.W. 762; Gabal v. St. L. & S.F.R. Co., 251 Mo. 257, 158 S.W. 12. (12) A ... ...
-
Hasenjaeger v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.
... ... R. Co. v ... Seeley, 180 Ky. 308, 202 S.W. 638, L.R.A. 1918D 925; ... Rashall v. St. Louis, I. M. & R., 249 Mo. 509; ... Bruce v. Missouri P. R. Co. (Mo. Supp.), 271 S.W ... 762; Gabal v. Railroad, 251 Mo. 257, 158 S.W. 12 ... (5) Plaintiff must prove negligence, the ... ...