Bruce v. Pearsall

Decision Date30 November 1896
PartiesBRUCE et al. v. PEARSALL.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Error to supreme court. For opinion of the supreme court, see 34 Atl. 982, 59 N. J. Law, 62.

Applegate & Degnan, for plaintiffs in error.

Edmund Wilson, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the supreme court is unanimously affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT