Brummett v. Parson, 78-7563

Decision Date08 December 1980
Docket NumberNo. 78-7563,78-7563
Citation49 Or.App. 588,619 P.2d 1355
PartiesBetty J. BRUMMETT, Respondent, v. Pete PARSON, John Biggs and Wayne Allen, Appellants. ; CA 16819.
CourtOregon Court of Appeals

Terence J. Hammons, Eugene, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Hammons & Jensen, Eugene.

William L. Tufts, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert E. Krambs and Barber & Krambs, Eugene.

Before JOSEPH, P. J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for fraud defendants appeal a judgment in favor of the plaintiff based on the jury verdict. Defendants assign as error the trial court's refusal of defendants' request for a poll of the jury, made immediately after the verdict was received. The statute in effect when this case was tried, ORS 17.355 (since repealed but with substantially the same language preserved in Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 59, G(3)), gives a party an absolute right to a poll upon request. See Eisele v. Rood, 275 Or. 461, 551 P.2d 441 (1976).

A review of that portion of the record relevant to this issue satisfies us that defendants did not waive their right to have the jury polled.

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Congdon v. Berg
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 2013
    ...right.” Id. at 20, 7 P.2d 796 (citations omitted); accord Eisele, 275 Or. at 468, 551 P.2d 441 (citing Freeman );Brummett v. Parson, 49 Or.App. 588, 588, 619 P.2d 1355 (1980) (citing Eisele ). Plaintiff does not dispute that general rule but offers three responses, the first two of which av......
  • Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General Motors
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • July 16, 1981
    ...211 Or. 459, 467, 316 P.2d 497 (1957); Freeman v. Wentworth and Irwin, Inc., 139 Or. 1, 7 P.2d 796 (1932); Brummett v. Parson, 49 Or.App. 588, 619 P.2d 1355 (1980). The relevant statute is former ORS 17.355(2), which "When a verdict is given, and before it is filed, the jury may be polled o......
  • St. Louis County v. Pennington
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 5, 1992
    ...is an absolute right or one which lies within the discretion of the trial court. Brooks, 358 P.2d at 1060; see also Brummett v. Parson, 49 Or.App. 588, 619 P.2d 1355 (1980) (statute, now a court Rule, grants absolute right to poll criminal jury); Logan v. Greenwich Hosp. Ass'n, 191 Conn. 28......
  • State v. Kerr, B57-314
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • February 3, 1981
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT